Re: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.FC3.13 appears to not like multiprocessors
From: Warren Togami (wtogami_at_redhat.com)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: Warren Togami: "Re: Squirrelmail and Index.php"
- In reply to: Seth Alford: "Re: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.FC3.13 appears to not like multiprocessors"
- Next in thread: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.FC3.13 appears to not like multiprocessors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:49:03 -1000 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Seth Alford wrote:
> I downloaded the previous xorg rpm's, version 6.8.1-12.FC3.21, from the Fedora
> web page. I forced rpm to load the previous packages, then I erased the newer
> xorg packages (6.8.2-1.FC3.13.) I should probably have done that in the
> opposite order. But, I'm now running with 2 processors enabled, no
> hyperthreading, in a gnome-terminal under X11.
>
> So something about the newer xorg packages disagreed with my dual processor
> system.
>
> BTW, I tried enabling hyperthreading again with the second processor disabled.
> Inexplicably, this time, the system locked up once I brought up X. I could
> have sworn that that worked correctly with the 6.8.2-1.FC3.13 packages.
>
Thank you for downgrading and verifying the issue. I would advise
reporting at bugzilla.redhat.com and search upstream for any existing
similar report. If nothing similar exists then also report upstream.
Note in both reports the equivalent RH/upstream report URL.
Warren Togami
wtogami@redhat.com
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Warren Togami: "Re: Squirrelmail and Index.php"
- In reply to: Seth Alford: "Re: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.FC3.13 appears to not like multiprocessors"
- Next in thread: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: xorg-x11-6.8.2-1.FC3.13 appears to not like multiprocessors"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|