md5sum discrepencies
From: Ryan (nospam_at_lucentflame.com)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: Problem with NFS after updating util-linux"
- Next in thread: Paul Howarth: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Reply: Paul Howarth: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Reply: William Hooper: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Reply: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:58:51 -0800 (PST) To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Hi all! I've recently installed and yum updated 2 indentical boxes, and
for fun and good measure I was running md5sums to see if the updates
worked correctly on both. However:
[root@tsuji etc]# md5sum /usr/sbin/sshd
61759cb28ff270f794a2e7efc15cb965 /usr/sbin/sshd
[root@eri proc]# md5sum /usr/sbin/sshd
1773adfda131e2496fafd898747245e2 /usr/sbin/sshd
Any ideas why? This also concerns me:
[root@tsuji etc]# md5sum /bin/ls
aad0775ac64588d61d258fabd2a777e1 /bin/ls
[root@eri proc]# md5sum /bin/ls
5101a32ed2e5680ccf49190bb42f0a7b /bin/ls
Both boxes are dual homed K6 450Mhz. Anyone have any suggestions? I
would figure they should all be the same, but I've seen stranger things.
Anyone know what the sums should be, or can point me in the direction to
find out?
Regards,
Ryan
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: Problem with NFS after updating util-linux"
- Next in thread: Paul Howarth: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Reply: Paul Howarth: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Reply: William Hooper: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Reply: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|