Re: md5sum discrepencies

• Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: Problem with NFS after updating util-linux"
• In reply to: Ryan: "md5sum discrepencies"
• Next in thread: William Hooper: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:03:36 +0100
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

Ryan wrote:
> Hi all! I've recently installed and yum updated 2 indentical boxes, and
> for fun and good measure I was running md5sums to see if the updates
> worked correctly on both. However:
>
> [root@tsuji etc]# md5sum /usr/sbin/sshd
> 61759cb28ff270f794a2e7efc15cb965 /usr/sbin/sshd
>
> [root@eri proc]# md5sum /usr/sbin/sshd
> 1773adfda131e2496fafd898747245e2 /usr/sbin/sshd
>
> Any ideas why? This also concerns me:
>
> [root@tsuji etc]# md5sum /bin/ls
> aad0775ac64588d61d258fabd2a777e1 /bin/ls
>
> [root@eri proc]# md5sum /bin/ls
> 5101a32ed2e5680ccf49190bb42f0a7b /bin/ls
>
> Both boxes are dual homed K6 450Mhz. Anyone have any suggestions? I
> would figure they should all be the same, but I've seen stranger things.
> Anyone know what the sums should be, or can point me in the direction to
> find out?

This is probably a prelink issue. Use "rpm -V" to verify the integrity
of your packages as that is prelink-aware.

Paul.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list

• Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: Problem with NFS after updating util-linux"
• In reply to: Ryan: "md5sum discrepencies"
• Next in thread: William Hooper: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]