Re: md5sum discrepencies
From: William Hooper (whooperhsd3_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 03/31/05
- Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- In reply to: Ryan: "md5sum discrepencies"
- Next in thread: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:06:21 -0500 (EST) To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Ryan said:
> Hi all! I've recently installed and yum updated 2 indentical boxes, and
> for fun and good measure I was running md5sums to see if the updates worked
> correctly on both.
Huh? Why would you use md5sums to do this?
> However:
>
> [root@tsuji etc]# md5sum /usr/sbin/sshd
> 61759cb28ff270f794a2e7efc15cb965 /usr/sbin/sshd
>
>
> [root@eri proc]# md5sum /usr/sbin/sshd
> 1773adfda131e2496fafd898747245e2 /usr/sbin/sshd
>
>
> Any ideas why?
Prelink. Search the archives for a lot of related discussion.
-- William Hooper -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- In reply to: Ryan: "md5sum discrepencies"
- Next in thread: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: md5sum discrepencies"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|