Re: bochs vs. vmware
From: g b (gbofspam_at_gmail.com)
Date: 04/15/05
- Previous message: Goran Bulut: "Re: BUG: check your ntpd, it may be dead"
- In reply to: kwhiskers: "bochs vs. vmware"
- Next in thread: Steffen Kluge: "Re: bochs vs. vmware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:01:32 -0400 To: kwhiskers <kwhiskers@gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On 4/14/05, kwhiskers <kwhiskers@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has anyone had much success with bochs?
Try qemu & kqemu http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/ To use kqemu
you'll need do compile from CVS, but I've had no problems with it, and
the performance increase from it makes it mandatory in my book.. I
use it with Win2K at work because my aging crossover office is too out
of date for FC3, and it runs plenty fast enough (about 50% native
speed, which beats the pants off *some* of the performance I've
experienced with VMWare). Very easy to use too.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Goran Bulut: "Re: BUG: check your ntpd, it may be dead"
- In reply to: kwhiskers: "bochs vs. vmware"
- Next in thread: Steffen Kluge: "Re: bochs vs. vmware"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
