Re: multimedia licensing

From: kwhiskers (kwhiskers_at_gmail.com)
Date: 04/19/05

  • Next message: Richard Crawford: "Scary cron daemon message"
    Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:53:59 -0600
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    
    

    Most of them open for me - you might want to install Microsoft's True Type
    fonts for compatibility
    Craig

    I have all 1200 and some odd Corel ttf fonts installed (from the Corel Draw
    9 disc). You mean I need even more? I think missing fonts is not the
    problem, but I might be wrong. I have Ariel, Times New Roman and loads and
    loads of other standard font families.

    are you sure that proselytizing is your role?

    No, proselytising is not my role. I do it very poorly and am basically not
    interested, because I realise that I would have to also become the personal
    computer tutor of each and every one. It's when I hear the moans and groans
    about having to buy software upgrades, needing cracks or bootlegged software
    in order to be able to use their computers, etc, that I think how good I
    have it and would like to introduce them to 'freedom', of sorts.

    they don't give it away but charge a premium for it and for that premium
    price, you get a non-transferable, single install and the opportunity to
    endless repurchase of a minimal use license

    You bet I figured it out! I bought Windows 95, then 98 and finally XP. I
    began to ask myself over and over again: Why am I rebuying what I already
    have and what works just fine for me? But with the Windows upgrades,
    suddenly the rest of my software didn't work well or at all, and I was
    forced, initially into the world of cracks and bootlegs, later into Linux.
    The latter has been a good thing for me.

    Re: Ogg Vorbis in Windows: So you expect Microsoft to put capabilities in
    their software to support a competing technology?

    Perhaps naïvely, I hadn't considered ogg vorbis to be a competing
    technology. I thought it was supposed to be an open technology that would
    permit everyone access to data, regardless of platform, and without the
    encumbrances of licensing issues. This seems to me in the spirit of the w3c,
    which is the defining body of the web.

    That is like expecting a fisherman to give away their best fishing spot.

    What do you mean? I just bought a mag that reveals the best and as yet
    undiscovered trout stream in these parts. Says so right on the cover LOL

    The problem is that Linux uses pure standards where MS uses standards they
    adopt and alter...

    Yes, this I am aware of. I have read some of the information on
    w3c.org<http://w3c.org>,
    and I recall the battles between Netscape and M$ of the past decade. That is
    another reason why I like Linux/free software. It does seem to support
    standards, hence promoting compatibility between platforms and users.

    If you are worried about quality, MP3 isn't the way to go in the first
    place.

    Would be nice, but napster didn't have FLAC back then. :-) Music is just
    another example of formats and the need to rebuy the same material over and
    over again. First I bought lps, then I switched to cassettes, then I had to
    buy the same music all over again on cd. Thanks God for napster. At least
    there was some fairness in all of these changes.

    I share all my documents with co-workers. It doesn't matter if they use
    Office or OOo. It works.

    I would like to have your confidence. When submitting a job application a
    year ago, I clenched my teeth and did it in Windows because I couldn't risk
    problems. It was too important. And this bugged me, because it represented a
    failure. But I stand by using Linux anyway. It is getting better all the
    time, as far as compatibility goes. In other respects, I feel it is
    superior. Yes, I am excited about the adoption of Oasis, too.

    When was Windows Media Player released for Linux?

    You have come into this discussion late without reading what has already
    been said.

    When I had said that I didn't feel comfortable converting all my mp3 files
    to ogg vorbis because I would no longer be able to share them with friends,
    I was told that winamp plays ogg on M$. I responded by stating that I didn't
    think M$ users would prefer winamp to W$ Media Player. Which comes back to
    the proselytising issue, doesn't it?

    While I'm very pleased at your enthusiasm, I'll must point out that this
    misses the point of what Free software is all about...

    Whoa! Gnu is expensive, all right.

    As an end user, I see the point of freedom more like the way Project
    Gutenberg sees it, I think (without reading their manifesto). I feel this is
    the 'main event', despite your position to the contrary. It is the position
    that media and culture are the domain and right of all, no matter in which
    country they reside and without exclusion based on financial assets. Since
    so much of what is produced in the world, information, news, culture, media,
    etc, is disseminated electronically, this freedom is vital to allow everyone
    access and participation. And this is only possible with free software.

    The point of the Freedom is the Freedom to create...

    And that makes it all the more interesting to an end user. New ideas and
    improvements to make the experience richer, more convenient, innovative...

    But I say yes! to html in mail (not usenet). How nice it is to receive an
    occasioal photograph, a well designed letter, using colour or fonts
    stylishly. That is the art of communication. A friend often writes to me,
    underlining his thoughts in colours. His letters have a personal character
    all his own. Mine are just plain black. As much as I enjoy good design and
    creativity, I don't have the time or ability myself.

    Thanks for all your comments. It is an interesting discussion.

    
    

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Richard Crawford: "Scary cron daemon message"

    Relevant Pages

    • [NT] Windows Embedded Open Type (EOT) Font Heap Overflow
      ... The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com ... A vulnerability in the way that Windows uncompresses Embedded Open Type ... fonts allow the author of a malicious web page to execute arbitrary code ... A heap overflow vulnerability exists in T2EMBED.DLL, ...
      (Securiteam)
    • Re: Changing default "Add Fonts" folder
      ... Microsoft MVP- Windows Shell/User ... Folder customizations ... I g2g to sleep. ... > Just drag the fonts in. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.customize)
    • Re: Openoffice disadvantages?
      ... And especially, interfaces with the outside world well, both in Mac word processors and the PC world, which I suppose is dominated by Microsoft Word, WordPad and Notepad included in Windows 2000/XP/Vista. ... No built-in fonts menu/fonts list, but only the ability to use the built-in FontBook list in the OS X systems. ... Also opening Mac-made .odt docs in Staroffice on windows is just as the original or visa-versa - opening starOffice .odt documents in Openoffice on a Mac is perfect. ... They chose three test persons - all dedicated MSOffice users and replaced their original computers with models set up only with Openoffice. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.apps)
    • Re: Openoffice disadvantages?
      ... WordPad and Notepad included in Windows 2000/XP/Vista. ... No built-in fonts menu/fonts list, ... OOo 3.0 is so fast and reliable that it very well can replace MSOffice ... documents in Openoffice on a Mac is perfect. ...
      (comp.sys.mac.apps)
    • Re: Changing default "Add Fonts" folder
      ... Ramesh - Microsoft MVP ... Windows XP Shell ... > Just drag the fonts in. ... When I want to install one or more of them for a few minutes I ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.customize)