Re: Latest perl.x86_64 conflicts

From: Leopoldo Olmos (leodoc_at_cantv.net)
Date: 04/28/05

  • Next message: akonstam_at_trinity.edu: "Re: Oh no no please no, more annoying Peter Whalley messages" 
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:15:56 -0400

    On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 13:24 -0400, Bob Chiodini wrote:
    > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:10 -0500, Jonathan Berry wrote:
    > > On 4/28/05, Bob Chiodini <rchiodin@bellsouth.net> wrote:
    > > > On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 07:55 -0400, Leopoldo Olmos wrote:
    > > > > The latest perl update (perl.x86_64 3:5.8.5-11.FC3 and perl-
    > > > > suidperl.x86_64 3:5.8.5-11.FC3.1) conflicts with file from package
    > > > > perl-5.8.5-9.
    > > > > What would be the best solution? rpm -e or wait for a new refurbished
    > > > > package?
    > > > >
    > > > > Leopoldo Olmos
    > > > >
    > > > > PD:
    > > > > ...
    > > > > Dependencies Resolved
    > > > > Transaction Listing:
    > > > > Update: perl.x86_64 3:5.8.5-11.FC3 - updates
    > > > > Update: perl-suidperl.x86_64 3:5.8.5-11.FC3.1 - updates
    > > > > Total download size: 12 M
    > > > > Is this ok [y/N]: y
    > > > > Downloading Packages:
    > > > > (1/2): perl-suidperl-5.8. 100% |=========================| 102 kB
    > > > > 00:10
    > > > > (2/2): perl-5.8.5-11.FC3. 100% |=========================| 12 MB
    > > > > 27:01
    > > > > Running Transaction Test
    > > > > Finished Transaction Test
    > > > > Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man1/c2ph.1.gz from
    > > > > install of perl-5.8.5-11.FC3 conflicts with file from package
    > > > > perl-5.8.5-9
    > > > > file /usr/share/man/man1/cpan.1.gz from install of perl-5.8.5-11.FC3
    > > > > conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.5-9
    > > > > file /usr/share/man/man1/dprofpp.1.gz from install of
    > > > > perl-5.8.5-11.FC3 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.5-9
    > > >
    > > > I forced the install of perl.x86_64 3:5.8.5-11.FC3 from the cache. It
    > > > looks like only man pages are in conflict.
    > > >
    > > > Bob...
    > >
    > > I ran into this same problem. The issue I experienced is that I also
    > > had the i386 perl package installed, but that package was not being
    > > offered in the x86_64 update tree. So I enabled the i386 updates repo
    > > that I created in /etc/yum.repos.d/ and updated perl. All worked fine
    > > with that:
    > >
    > > $ sudo yum --enablerepo=updates-released-i386 update perl
    > >
    > > To create the updates-released-i386 repo, copy the fedora-updates.repo
    > > (I think that's the name) file and put the mirrors in that you want
    > > with i386 hard coded in instead of the arch macro. Also, change the
    > > name in the [] at the top to be updates-released-i386 (or whatever you
    > > want). Also, you could download the i386 rpm manually and update it
    > > and the x86_64 package in the yum cache at the same time.
    > >
    > > Jonathan
    > >
    >
    > I just tried a test removal of perl-5.8.5-9 no conflicts or dependency
    > issues resulted. Does anyone have an idea whether the older i386
    > version is safe to remove, and moreover how did two versions get
    > installed?
    >
    > BTW: file /usr/bin/perl
    > /usr/bin/perl: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV),
    > for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
    >
    > If you sudo yum --enablerepo=updates-released-i386 update perl which
    > executable do you get as a default the 386 or the x64?
    >
    > Bob...
    >
    >
    >
    > Bob...
    >
    Thanks Bob for your advice.
    I've got the same questions

    Leopoldo Olmos
    > 

    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: akonstam_at_trinity.edu: "Re: Oh no no please no, more annoying Peter Whalley messages"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Latest perl.x86_64 conflicts
      ... On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 13:24 -0400, Bob Chiodini wrote: ... > version is safe to remove, and moreover how did two versions get ... Leopoldo Olmos ... To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Where to find a searchable mirror of fedora-list?
      ... Bob Chiodini wrote: ... Looks promising, I agree. ... School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland ... To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Res keystroke
      ... Bob Chiodini wrote: ... >>Is there still a keystroke to increase and decrease the screen resolution? ... the res.. ... To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ...
      (Fedora)
    • re: mplayer x86_64
      ... Bob Chiodini wrote: ... gcc32 means gcc 3.2, not 32-bit. ... To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list ...
      (Fedora)