Re: brute force ssh attack
From: Nigel Wade (nmw_at_ion.le.ac.uk)
Date: 04/29/05
- Previous message: Matthew Miller: "Re: installing rpms from yum"
- In reply to: Matthew Miller: "Re: brute force ssh attack"
- Next in thread: Nigel Wade: "Re: brute force ssh attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:50:20 +0100 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:06:26AM -0400, William Hooper wrote:
>
>>Running untrusted executables as root is a PBCAK. Period. I don't care
>>what OS you are running, be it Linux or BSD or WinXP.
>>In this context, the reason that Linux is "better than Windows" is because
>>it was designed from the ground up to do day to day tasks with a non-root
>>user. Anyone that circumvents this (Linspire anyone?) is asking for the
>>same trouble that a Windows system always running as root has.
>
>
> I think we're basically in agreement. However, I'm afraid that simple
> dismissive statements like the "~0" one I responded to are part of the
> problem. It has the risk of leaving the wrong impression, and leading to the
> sort of fuzzy thinking that brings us Linspire's run-as-root model.
>
My statement was in no way dismissive, it was my assessment of the risk
posed by this particular virus. What doesn't help is people getting all
worked up and panicing about something which a very, very minor threat.
--
Nigel Wade, System Administrator, Space Plasma Physics Group,
University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
E-mail : nmw@ion.le.ac.uk
Phone : +44 (0)116 2523548, Fax : +44 (0)116 2523555
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Matthew Miller: "Re: installing rpms from yum"
- In reply to: Matthew Miller: "Re: brute force ssh attack"
- Next in thread: Nigel Wade: "Re: brute force ssh attack"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
