"mapping drives"; autofs issues

From: James Pifer (jep_at_obrien-pifer.com)
Date: 05/23/05

  • Next message: John Summerfied: "Re: OT web session question"
    To: Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 09:03:10 -0400
    
    

    I have a handful of machines running Linux (mostly FC3) and Windows (2K
    and XP). On my laptop I have FC3. I'm having a lot of problems with
    keeping drives "mapped" or mounted. Here's what I'm currently doing.

    On all the linux machines samba is installed, and my userid has admin
    access to root so I can get to the whole drive and pretty much do what I
    want. On windows I just use the admin shares.

    On my laptop I'm running autofs and have all the mounts setup in
    auto.misc. Right now I'm using fstype=smbfs. The problem is that
    sometimes the mount will get hosed up, maybe the other machine crashed
    or was not accessible for one reason or another. When this happens I
    have to try and figure out how to kill whatever process is hosing it up
    so I can try to restart autofs. Sometimes I can do it, other times I
    can't. When I can't have to logout or restart completely, very annoying.

    On a Windows machine it will not have a problem with the same share.
    Windows appears to do a better job of handling this situation. It seems
    to more easily reconnect automatically.

    Besides that problem, I've also had problems copying large amounts of
    data over these mount points. I don't have any exact errors to quote at
    the moment, but they fail consistently.

    I've looked at NFS as an option as well, but I've had permission issues
    with that. I'd like to have full access on the drives. Creating a samba
    share and granting admin access fits what I want.

    Can anyone suggest any better ways of doing this? I hate to compare it
    to windows but on my windows machines I can map the same shares on any
    of my other windows machines or Linux machines (using samba), and the
    mappings are always accessible or reconnect once the machine in question
    is available.

    Any help is appreciated.

    James

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: John Summerfied: "Re: OT web session question"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: M$ attack on Common Sense
      ... > (Note that not all Unix virii can effect Linux and vice versa, ... > virii, if you don't run Windows, you don't need to be doing that, now do ... Compare machines AND take into consideration what they are for. ... Install means changing the system so the program will run. ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • Re: M$ attack on Common Sense
      ... > (Note that not all Unix virii can effect Linux and vice versa, ... > virii, if you don't run Windows, you don't need to be doing that, now do ... Compare machines AND take into consideration what they are for. ... Install means changing the system so the program will run. ...
      (alt.computer.security)
    • Re: M$ attack on Common Sense
      ... > (Note that not all Unix virii can effect Linux and vice versa, ... > virii, if you don't run Windows, you don't need to be doing that, now do ... Compare machines AND take into consideration what they are for. ... Install means changing the system so the program will run. ...
      (comp.os.ms-windows.nt.admin.security)
    • Re: Video editing in Linux?
      ... >> or the desire to screw other people's machines up. ... >manufacturwers knew they could sell enough to putrely windows users to ... Does linux take full advantage of your graphics card? ... PC plugin to a plugin within a linux application? ...
      (alt.linux)
    • Re: Cryptogram Comment
      ... >> bother me with Windows questions. ... >> machines are broken. ... Just like if you don't know to tune up your car every year then you ... > and Linux and other open OS's make all patches FREE to redistribute. ...
      (sci.crypt)