Re: No FC2 updates anymore in all repo's?
From: Temlakos (temlakos_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 17:44:39 -0400 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <email@example.com>
Andy Green wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Danny Terweij wrote:
> | --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> | Error: missing dep: libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.4) for pkg apt
> | That is the point where I am... i dont know how to solve that.
> | Thank you for the help.
> If I understand this correctly, many of these problems are coming from
> apps like apt you installed from a non-Fedora RPM, and because you did
> not add the repo that contains the FC3 version of these non-Fedora RPMs,
> yum has no way to upgrade them and complains about the old, incompatible
> libs needed by the FC2 version.
> My solution would be to rpm -e, for example, apt, synaptic, bittorrent,
> opensc and as many of the other FC2-specific things you installed that
> do not have an FC3 version available in Fedora, and do the yum update
> again and see what errors are left.
> - -Andy
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Well then, let's all agree on something: how long after the public
release of FC4 should we wait until most non-Fedora repos (freshrpms,
atrpms, dag, dries, etc.) develop their FC4 versions? I assume that
extras, base, and updates-released are the main Fedora repos that we
-- fedora-list mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list