Re: :( FC4 missing apps
From: Frank Pineau (frank_at_pineaus.com)
Date: 06/16/05
- Previous message: Patrick Boutilier: "Re: OT Linux question - running a process in background"
- In reply to: Ben Steeves: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Next in thread: Patrick Boutilier: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Reply: Patrick Boutilier: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Reply: Thomas Taylor: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Reply: Serge de Souza: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:45:32 -0500
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:57:07 -0300, you wrote:
>Mplayer has never been provided in FC because of patent/licensing
>restrictions. I suggest you try rpm.livna.org or freshrpms.net before
>you go building from source.
FC4 yum repositories are sparse at the moment.
>I agree that Evo is a little flakey though.
>
>Why do you need Checkinstall if you install everything from RPMs?
I don't install everything from RPM, but given that mplayer RPMS (for FC4)
aren't on any of the usual places yet (dag, freshrpms, etc.) , I have to compile
from source if I want to use it today. For things like that, I use
checkinstall, but it doesn't currently work under 4.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Patrick Boutilier: "Re: OT Linux question - running a process in background"
- In reply to: Ben Steeves: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Next in thread: Patrick Boutilier: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Reply: Patrick Boutilier: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Reply: Thomas Taylor: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Reply: Serge de Souza: "Re: :( FC4 missing apps"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|