Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?

From: Aaron Gaudio (prothonotar_at_tarnation.dyndns.org)
Date: 06/17/05

  • Next message: Des Johnston: "Re: FC4 bluetooth pairing problems, phone <-> laptop? (OK in FC3)"
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:08:32 -0400
    
    

    On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 14:27 -0400, Pete Toscano wrote:
    > Aaron Gaudio wrote:
    >
    > > 1. No menu item... I wasn't able to locate a GNOME menu item to launch
    > > the NetworkManagerNotification tasklet. Did I overlook it or is it not
    > > present? I had to run /usr/libexec/NetworkManagerNotification manually
    > > from a terminal.
    >
    > Try running NetworkManagerInfo. It'll give you an icon in the
    > notification area.

    Does this do anything different than
    running /usr/libexec/NetworkManagerNotification itself?

    >
    > > 2. Once scanning, NetworkManager does not detect my network, which makes
    > > sense since my network does not broadcast ESSID. So, I click on the task
    > > icon and select "Create New Wireless Network...". I get a dialog asking
    > > for the ESSID and WEP key. These I enter in and save them. After a few
    > > seconds, NetworkManager starts trying to connect to the network
    > > ("tarnation"). However it never gets further than trying. Running
    > > iwconfig at this time doesn't show the ESSID being set.
    >
    > I think the "Create New Wireless Network..." dialog actually sets up an
    > adhoc network. What you probably want is "Other Wireless Networks..."
    > That's where I configure my non-beaconing/WEP network.
    >

    Yes, I tried "Other Wireless Networks..." too, with the same results.

    > My biggest complaints about NM are:
    >
    > 1. Every-so-often, the wireless card's power management is turned off.
    >
    > 2. I can't figure out how to have anything but WEP or no WEP. I'd like
    > to do WPA-PSK, but I think I'll need to do that by hand.

    >From scouring the fedora-test list, it seems that WPA simply hasn't been
    implemented yet.

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Des Johnston: "Re: FC4 bluetooth pairing problems, phone <-> laptop? (OK in FC3)"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Wireless Pent-Test
      ... If this is for home use have them turn WEP and MAC Address filtering on. ... You need to secure access to your protected network. ... So your VPN is ... his wireless network packets to make sure it is 128 bit encryption... ...
      (Pen-Test)
    • Re: HP2210 w/Linksys WCF54G wifi card (JC)
      ... the WEP settings are virtually identical...ie. ... "Jeff Cunningham" wrote in message ... Yes I am using WEP 128bit encryption. ... When I check one of the profiles, no "Network name" shows up and I ...
      (microsoft.public.pocketpc.wireless)
    • Re: Dumb question abt. Wireless WEP security
      ... that under their tests cracking WEP using a weak scheduling attack averages ... I have cracked WEP and it is not a picnic, ... > the amount of time required to obtain enough weak IV's on the network ... > every set amount of packets. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: 802.11i research papers
      ... IT Infrastructure - Network Design ... Subject: 802.11i research papers ... with WPA which is the replacement to WEP (TKIP is ... WEP and other security features that the protocol has implemented. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Wireless and "not so much on" internal attacks
      ... 128bit WEP. ... The question about internal attacks stems from the fact that customers have ... Wireless and "not so much on" internal attacks ... While on the network an attack would become more of an ...
      (Security-Basics)