Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?
From: Pete Toscano (pete-fedora_at_verisignlabs.com)
Date: 06/18/05
- Previous message: Les Mikesell: "Re: any reason for things SMP on a single processor"
- In reply to: Aaron Gaudio: "Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?"
- Next in thread: Aaron Gaudio: "Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?"
- Reply: Aaron Gaudio: "Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:48:38 -0400 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Aaron Gaudio wrote:
> Does this do anything different than
> running /usr/libexec/NetworkManagerNotification itself?
Looks like it handles the session management stuff better than
NetworkManagerNotification. Well, by better I mean, it does. ;) Aside
from that, I don't see much difference.
> From scouring the fedora-test list, it seems that WPA simply hasn't been
> implemented yet.
Yeah, I had found that too. I'm just impatient. :)
pete
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Les Mikesell: "Re: any reason for things SMP on a single processor"
- In reply to: Aaron Gaudio: "Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?"
- Next in thread: Aaron Gaudio: "Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?"
- Reply: Aaron Gaudio: "Re: FC4 and NetworkManager?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]