Re: yum updated grub.conf badly
From: Matthew Miller (mattdm_at_mattdm.org)
Date: 06/20/05
- Previous message: Matthew Miller: "Re: yum updated grub.conf badly"
- In reply to: Michael Hennebry: "Re: yum updated grub.conf badly"
- Next in thread: Matthew Miller: "Re: yum updated grub.conf badly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 20:03:49 -0400 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:18:05PM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> > > I've been told that smp+hyperthreading is flaky, so it's not just me.
> > > Flaky should not be the default.
> > It's flaky in the sense that it's not a performance win in all workloads.
> > But it shouldn't be more flaky than SMP in general, and that should be
> > pretty solid.
> The context in which I was told smp+hyperthreading is flaky
> was as an explanation for why my problem wasn't a surprise.
Well, hyperthreading *without* smp is "no hyperthreading". And the only
particular flakiness I'm aware of is that it isn't a performance win for
many workloads.
-- Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 76 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Matthew Miller: "Re: yum updated grub.conf badly"
- In reply to: Michael Hennebry: "Re: yum updated grub.conf badly"
- Next in thread: Matthew Miller: "Re: yum updated grub.conf badly"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
