Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?
From: Matthew Miller (mattdm_at_mattdm.org)
Date: 06/27/05
- Previous message: Uno Engborg: "Re: ldap auth with nss_ldap on FC4"
- In reply to: Les Mikesell: "Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Next in thread: Mark Wielaard: "Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:24:41 -0400 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 12:14:27PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Note that the FSF definition of free is in contrast most other uses of
> the word. Java is 'not-free' only in that fanatical sense.
This a is an obviously loaded post, but I'll reply anyway. Fanatical or not,
it's not *practically* free enough to be included in Fedora, because its
license forbids it.
-- Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 85 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Uno Engborg: "Re: ldap auth with nss_ldap on FC4"
- In reply to: Les Mikesell: "Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Next in thread: Mark Wielaard: "Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]