Re: Which way to go finally ? -- Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?
From: Alexander Dalloz (ad+lists_at_uni-x.org)
Date: 06/27/05
- Previous message: rob_at_Mokkinksystems.com: "home directories fedora directoryserver"
- In reply to: ha haha: "Re: Which way to go finally ? -- Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Next in thread: Matthew Miller: "Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 22:21:00 +0200
Am Mo, den 27.06.2005 schrieb ha haha um 22:13:
> > Sorry, I must miss something. What makes you think
> > jpackage.org has a
> > "default java", which is version 1.4.2?
> >
>
> I think I may have blamed jpacakge wrongly,
> apologize. But the java version "1.4.2" I complained
> is from GCJ.
Oh!
> by the way, what's the 'exact relationship' between
> libgcj and jpacakge?
jpackage.org provides a skeleton to package Sun's j2re as a Fedora compatible
RPM.
> [root@myTest ~]# /usr/bin/java --version
> java version "1.4.2"
> gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat
> 4.0.0-8)
> Is there a way to remove|uninstall libgcj and use Sun
> Java 1.5 instead? removing libgcj seems nuking out a
> lot of other packages depending on it.
You don't need to remove the Java Fedora ships. There is the
alternatives mechanism to switch between the different Java engines.
Alexander
-- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 22:17:43 up 2 days, 5:09, load average: 0.11, 0.16, 0.16
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- Previous message: rob_at_Mokkinksystems.com: "home directories fedora directoryserver"
- In reply to: ha haha: "Re: Which way to go finally ? -- Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Next in thread: Matthew Miller: "Re: Why FC4 using the Jpackage 1.4.2 Java?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|