Re: Can't find existing Fedora on FC3>FC4 upgrade

From: Jim Cornette (fc-cornette_at_insight.rr.com)
Date: 06/30/05

  • Next message: Deron Meranda: "Re: SSH trickery using -R"
    Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:45:33 -0400
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Andy Schlei wrote:

    > I am trying to upgrade FC3>FC4. I have booted from the boot.iso CD
    > (burned) and am installing from HTTP with the source loaded on another
    > machine on my local network.
    >
    > My problem is that the installer does not find any existing
    > implementation of Fedora, so goes into the new install path rather
    > than the upgrade path. I have successfully upgraded a FC3 machine
    > using this same approach (the test machine, which is now the source
    > for the HTTP install) and the same CD on a machine that is using
    > default LVM partitioning.
    >
    > I have faiirly standard partitioning using LVM.
    >
    > What does Fedora do to find an existing implementation? How can I
    > make sure that it finds it? Any way to avoid a full re-installation.
    >
    > Thanks in advance.
    >
    >

    Sorry to answer again (or question)

    I checked bugzilla for entries against FC4 and test versions before FC4
    was released. I have experienced the problem myself. Anyway, since you
    want to upgrade vs. doing a reinstallation, filing a bug report against
    anaconda. The saying that it isn't a bug unless someone reports it might
    be true here. I should have filed a bug report against it myself. Now
    that someone else has seen the problem, it seems more than just
    something happened at one point in the development phase.

    I still have the disk that contains the LVM installation. It is in
    FC4test2 condition or whenever yum went down due to sql-lile or
    something. You have my curiousity up now.

    Regarding other options, you could download and install the fedora
    release package from a mirror. This will install the repos and other
    information needed for the FC4 release. In /etc/yum.repos.d there will
    be files for the repos tagged on the end with rpmnew. These files are
    what your repos listings should be changed to. Rename your current .repo
    files to .repo.old - rename the fedora.repo.rpmnew files to not include
    the .rpmnew appending of name. Then you could try running yum update to
    get your system up to FC4. As far as I recall, only a few packages were
    needed after trying the installer later on my system. The below packages
    were upgraded after I did as mentioned above. Upgrade the fedora-release
    package and remove the .rpmnew apending from the repo files.

    This is what packages you might be missing out on using the yum method.

    Upgrading firefox-1.0.4-4.i386.
    Upgrading cman-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.2.i686.
    Upgrading dlm-kernel-2.6.11.5-20050601.152643.FC4.2.i686.
    Upgrading comps-4-0.20050606.i386.

    I'll swap disks to see if the installation on the LVM fails to be
    recognized during the install attempt shortly.

    When you file a bug report, you might be able to pose your question as
    to what the installer uses to detect previous installations.

    Jim

    -- 
    UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that
    would also stop you from doing clever things.
    		-- Doug Gwyn
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Deron Meranda: "Re: SSH trickery using -R"

    Relevant Pages

    • Apt Gone Mad?-Or Is It Me?-Expert Help Needed
      ... So tried to upgrade OO to 2.0 but Apt refused to do so. ... Aptitude doesn't show anything but Wajig shows unmet dependency for kdelibs-data. ... The following packages are unused and will be REMOVED: agsync arson barcode brahms cdda2wav cddb digikam digikamimageplugins gmessage guarddog guidedog hotswap-gui hotswap-text i2e id3v2 kbarcode kbear kbiff kdebase-dev kdirstat kile kimdaba klog klogic kmymoney2 knetfilter knutclient komba2 kover kprof kpsk krusader ksimus ksimus-boolean ksimus-datarecorder ksimus-floatingpoint ksocrat ksocrat-data kvdr kvirc kvirc-data kvirc-doc kwavecontrol kxmleditor lesstif2 libdynamite libimlib2-dev libkonq4-dev libmimedir liborange ... ChatagnierL-Home:/temp# wajig install openoffice.org Reading Package Lists... ...
      (Debian-User)
    • Re: [opensuse] Architecture switch 32->64 bit (i386 to x86-64)
      ... A "simple" upgrade with Yast from 10.3 installmedia leads to lots of dependency problems when resolving the packages. ... I wanted to get my kernel to 64-bits. ... One rpm line shows 55 rpm packages I had to install at same ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: Where are the SuSE 9.2 Professional CD ISOs?
      ... Because of dependencies among packages, it's often not practical to upgrade package versions in a particular version of Suse. ... I'm not ready yet to do a fresh install on my sole PC at home which I actually *use* productively on a daily basis. ...
      (alt.os.linux.suse)
    • Re: FC2 doubtful quality?
      ... >that one cannot upgrade from a test release to a new FC release. ... I have one system that is always paced with current rawhide packages. ... I have another version that is an install of FC1 and went through the ... pre-existing config files on several occasions. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Web vs. Desktop based systems
      ... provider with better privacy policy (perhaps Yahoo) also provides ... to other folder or reporting spam or changing the filter recipes. ... But how do you *really* know the important upgrade that keeps ... The alert-window doesn't exactly say *why* you need to install this ...
      (comp.programming)