Re: Some thoughts for the future

From: Uno Engborg (uno_at_webworks.se)
Date: 06/30/05

  • Next message: Darryl Jones: "RE: FC3 core over RH9, now no BIND - UPDATE"
    Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:19:48 +0200
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    
    

    Stefan Held wrote:

    >Am Mittwoch, den 29.06.2005, 14:25 -0700 schrieb Richard Kelsch:
    >
    >
    >>Since Fedora is supposed to be "bleeding-edge," I have thought of a few
    >>things that may be cool for the future, not just for Fedora but Linux in
    >>general:
    >>
    >>* How about the ability to install via SRPMS for the specific CPU
    >>platform I'm using? In other words, as an advanced install option,
    >>allow me to have the installer use the SRPMS instead of the precompiled
    >>RPMS, and allow me to define the compiler optimizations for CPU etc.
    >>That would be cool. Ok, a slow install, but this isn't a production OS,
    >>so why not? I hate having an Athlon-XP running code optimized for a
    >>P4. Sure, an install could take days, but it would be an option I'd
    >>use. Why? Because I can and it's certainly bleeding-edge.
    >>
    >>
    >
    >Kewl open your editor and start to code.
    >

    Start coding is not a good response to people that comes with
    suggestions. Everybody know that GNU/Linux is free software and that it
    is possible to contribute. However, the person who gives us the
    suggestion may not have the skill, or time to do it himself.
    That doesn't mean that his idea is bad. (I'm talking about ideas in
    general. I have no oppinion on the SRPM issue). By posting he may get
    somebody else interested, or he might expand our knowledge on how Linux
    is used, so why should they not post.

    By giving answers like "Start coding" we discourage newbies or non tech
    savy user from giving suggestions. It is very important to pick up
    oppinion from such users as you as a programmer often get blind to how
    ordinary users, as secretarys and such, use their computers and what
    problems they have. Just ansvering start codig, doesn't add anything useful.

    Regards
    Uno Engborg

    
    

    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Darryl Jones: "RE: FC3 core over RH9, now no BIND - UPDATE"

    Relevant Pages

    • help please remove me from the list.
      ... Re: Web Browsers ... No network after upgrade to Fedora 2 ... We are using a router but linux has so many browsers that it by passes the proxy server that I hav set using squid. ... >>I'm using the one from jpackage and I had to install the webapps>>seperately. ...
      (Fedora)
    • RE: Some thoughts for the future
      ... > things that may be cool for the future, not just for Fedora but Linux ... > * How about the ability to install via SRPMS for the specific CPU ... Fedora needs a cooler looking GUI. ... up with is about a 7 step process to get a windows (active directory) ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: not genuine Windows
      ... that with Linux. ... install, side by side, and then start testing applications with the ... with all patches before Fedora even finishes updating from yum..... ... The updates took about 15 minutes. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: not genuine Windows
      ... that with Linux. ... install, side by side, and then start testing applications with the ... with all patches before Fedora even finishes updating from yum..... ... The updates took about 15 minutes. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Is Linux always so frustating^
      ... but I'm really frustrated with Linux (Fedora). ... In these days I tried a substitue to FrontPage, but I failed to install ... http://www.vessella.it (italiano, esperanto, kiswahili, english) ...
      (Fedora)