Re: chmod broken?
From: Bill Rees (breeze_at_smsonline.com)
Date: 06/30/05
- Previous message: Robert P. J. Day: "anyone else having trouble with "yum update" on FC4?"
- In reply to: Markku Kolkka: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Next in thread: Mike McCarty: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Reply: Mike McCarty: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Reply: Markku Kolkka: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 11:47:10 -0700 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Markku Kolkka wrote:
> Bill Rees kirjoitti viestissään (lähetysaika torstai, 30.
> kesäkuuta 2005 08:26):
>
>> Whoever
>> owns the file can chmod the file but if you're just a member
>> of the group you get the permission denied messages.
>>
>
> This is exactly how chmod is supposed to work according to the
> Single Unix Specification:
> "Only a process whose effective user ID matches the user ID of
> the file, or a process with the appropriate privileges, shall be
> permitted to change the file mode bits of a file."
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/chmod.html
>
>
Then what's the point of groups?
bill
p.s. sorry to waste your time on this.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Robert P. J. Day: "anyone else having trouble with "yum update" on FC4?"
- In reply to: Markku Kolkka: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Next in thread: Mike McCarty: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Reply: Mike McCarty: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Reply: Markku Kolkka: "Re: chmod broken?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|