Re: FC3 core over RH9, now no BIND - UPDATE

From: Alexander Dalloz (ad+lists_at_uni-x.org)
Date: 06/30/05

  • Next message: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support" 
    To: darryl@spyproductions.com, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:00:02 +0200

    Am Do, den 30.06.2005 schrieb Darryl Jones um 17:41:

    Please don't top-post.

    > Ok, I chrooted BIND and now it sees the zone files. The issue I'm having is
    > that BIND won't start.
    > I created the user and group "named" and chowned everything under
    > /var/named/chown/var/named to named:named, and set /dev/null etc but it
    > doesn't want to start.

    > Darryl Jones

    bind is verbose when starting. You see syslog messages in
    /var/log/messages.
    I don't understand why you felt to create an named user manually and why
    to set permissions by hand, including to make the chroot environment
    complete.
    There are several possible reasons why your bind fails. We have too less
    information about your setup to judge. One general - which is a
    difference to your previous RH9 - change is that on FC3 you have to keep
    an open eye on SELinux if this is active.

    Alexander 

    -- 
Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773
legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html
Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp 
Serendipity 22:55:49 up 5 days, 5:47, load average: 0.01, 0.07, 0.08 



    


    -- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Rahul Sundaram: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support"