Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support
From: Rahul Sundaram (sundaram_at_redhat.com)
Date: 06/30/05
- Previous message: beartooth: "Re: Restarting the mouse after KVM switch"
- In reply to: Julius Smith: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support"
- Next in thread: Julius Smith: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support"
- Reply: Julius Smith: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 02:41:22 +0530 To: jos@ccrma.stanford.edu, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Julius Smith wrote:
>On 6/30/05, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>>If the software doesnt work with either gcc 3.2 or gcc 4.x then its
>>probably broken. GCC 4.x is there as the primary compiler. compat-gcc-32
>>for legacy support. I am not sure what else could be done better here.
>>any ideas?
>>
>>
>
>This has been working very well for me. However, it took me a while
>to figure out that I needed
>
>yum install compat-gcc-32
>./configure --cc=gcc32
>
>It would have been nice to have this info in the FC4 release notes
>near then end of the section "6.3.1. GCC Compiler Collection", or
>perhaps in the "Caveats" subsection.
>
>Julius
>
>
>
great idea. Kindly file it against fedora-docs and we will have a
release notes errata
regards
Rahul
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: beartooth: "Re: Restarting the mouse after KVM switch"
- In reply to: Julius Smith: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support"
- Next in thread: Julius Smith: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support"
- Reply: Julius Smith: "Re: FC4 good new tech, bad legacy support"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]