Re: simple ping; pinging 101
From: Alex Evonosky (alex_at_alexevon.org)
Date: 07/06/05
- Previous message: Mike McCarty: "Re: Boot cd needed to install Fedora 4"
- In reply to: THUFIR HAWAT: "Re: simple ping; pinging 101"
- Next in thread: Scot L. Harris: "Re: simple ping; pinging 101"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 11:41:45 -0400 To: THUFIR HAWAT <hawat.thufir@gmail.com>, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
THUFIR HAWAT wrote:
>
> arrakis eth0 123.12.23.43
> arrakis eth1 192.168.0.1
> caladan eth0 192.168.0.2
Curious..
Why do you have the same subnet on two interfaces? would it not be
easier to seperate the traffic maybe in /24 or /29 networks to seperate
the traffic on different interfaces?
e.g. All 192.168.0.0/24 traffic on eth1
other networks on different interfaces.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Mike McCarty: "Re: Boot cd needed to install Fedora 4"
- In reply to: THUFIR HAWAT: "Re: simple ping; pinging 101"
- Next in thread: Scot L. Harris: "Re: simple ping; pinging 101"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|