Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
From: William Hooper (whooperhsd3_at_earthlink.net)
Date: 07/17/05
- Previous message: Matthew Miller: "Re: Max Files Per Directory"
- In reply to: Jeff Vian: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- Next in thread: Paul Howarth: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- Reply: Paul Howarth: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:33:12 -0400 (EDT) To: fedora-list@redhat.com
Jeff Vian wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 13:42 -0400, William Hooper wrote:
>
>> Matthew Saltzman wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>>> "rpm --import" the appropriate GPG keys from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ and
>>> try again.
>>>
>>> It would be nice if the first use of up2date would do this, at least
>>> for RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora and RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds like a regression from FC3. Anyone bothered to file a bug yet?
>>
>>
>
> Why consider that a bug? An enhancement request maybe, but not a bug.
> Did FC3 do the import automagically?
FC1 through FC3 asked to do the import, hence my comment that it was a
regression from FC3.
-- William Hooper -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Matthew Miller: "Re: Max Files Per Directory"
- In reply to: Jeff Vian: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- Next in thread: Paul Howarth: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- Reply: Paul Howarth: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
