Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su"
From: Tony Nelson (tonynelson_at_georgeanelson.com)
Date: 07/17/05
- Previous message: Tony Nelson: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- In reply to: John Bray: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Next in thread: Claude Jones: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Reply: Claude Jones: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Reply: Paul Howarth: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:27:10 -0400 To: <fedora-list@redhat.com>
At 2:13 AM -0500 7/17/05, John Bray wrote:
>here's a classic case of how to realllly screw up. su - to root. echo
>$PATH note that some dolt has managed to set root's path to include
>/usr/local/bin BEFORE the official sbins! want to guess how this
>stupidity is eventually going to bite us all? :-(
Mine isn't quite so bad, but it does turn out to have the pattern
"foo/sbin", "foo/bin". I expect that you're saying that it should be all
sbins, then the bins. I think I'll change it to that.
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@georgeanelson.com>
' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Tony Nelson: "Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;"
- In reply to: John Bray: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Next in thread: Claude Jones: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Reply: Claude Jones: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Reply: Paul Howarth: "Re: Why use "su -" rather than "su""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|