Re: hwclock and audit system
From: Alexander Dalloz (ad+lists_at_uni-x.org)
Date: 07/29/05
- Previous message: Ping-Wu Zhang: "FC4 on HP ze2000"
- In reply to: Berna Massingill: "Re: hwclock and audit system"
- Next in thread: Berna Massingill: "Re: hwclock and audit system"
- Reply: Berna Massingill: "Re: hwclock and audit system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:39:41 +0200
Am Fr, den 29.07.2005 schrieb Berna Massingill um 21:53:
> >> > > hwclock --show | cat
> >> > >
> >> > > Does that help?
>
> It did for me (newly-installed FC4 system on Dell Dimension,
> hwclock from util-linux-2.12p-9.5).
>
> I notice also that:
>
> (*) hwclock produces output if run from one of the virtual text
> consoles, but not if run from an xterm (unless piped to another
> command, as you describe above).
>
> (*) /sbin/hwclock does not produce output, but if I copy /sbin/hwclock
> to, say, /root/hwclock, /root/hwclock produces output.
>
> (*) If run as /sbin/hwclock, strace output indicates that the program
> makes a call to ioctl, which works in a text console but not in an
> xterm. If run as /root/hwclock, it doesn't make that call, and all
> is well.
Interesting. Maybe one of the SELinux gurus is willing to jump in an
enlighten us mortals.
> >> > No change. Why do you think it would?
>
> I'm interested in the explanation as well -- why piping the output
> to another command makes a difference. A colleague also says "ask
> him whether he found this by accident or whether he knew it would
> work because of some deep understanding ...." So -- ?
Fair question. I "know" it from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=150153
> >> http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/release-notes/fc4/errata/#sn-overview
> >>
> >> hwclock is in the list of daemons covered by the targeted policy. This
> >> means hwclock may or may not have control over the terminal.
>
> Would I be right in guessing that this explains why putting the
> executable in a different directory changes the results??
>
> >> Though it
> >> seems this issue is a different one (on the German speaking Fedora list
> >> the cat pipe helped recently[1]).
> >>
> >> Alexander
> >>
> >> [1]
> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-de-list/2005-June/msg00109.html
>
> If only I read German!
Should have been just a reference, as the thread too shows a strace
output.
> -- blm
Alexander
-- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 23:36:56 up 14 days, 4:09, load average: 0.12, 0.15, 0.17
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- application/pgp-signature attachment: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
- Previous message: Ping-Wu Zhang: "FC4 on HP ze2000"
- In reply to: Berna Massingill: "Re: hwclock and audit system"
- Next in thread: Berna Massingill: "Re: hwclock and audit system"
- Reply: Berna Massingill: "Re: hwclock and audit system"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|