Re: swap file vs. swap partition
From: Dotan Cohen (dotancohen_at_gmail.com)
Date: 07/30/05
- Previous message: Peter Magnusson: "Re: supported 802.11g pcmcia card + WPA support"
- In reply to: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: swap file vs. swap partition"
- Next in thread: Peter Arremann: "Re: swap file vs. swap partition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:36:11 +0300 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On 7/30/05, Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer <ml2news@optonline.net> wrote:
> menscher@uiuc.edu (Damian Menscher) writes:
> > A swap partition would be faster (think about it -- no filesystem
> > overhead).
>
> Not true anymore. There is no overhead for a swap file compared to a swap
> partition:
http://groups.google.com/group/fa.linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/801af09eaf08147c/7bbb9d44ece78faf?lnk=st&q=group:*kernel*+swap+file+partition&rnum=1#7bbb9d44ece78faf
>
Very interesting, thank you. I think that if I can do it, however, I
will go with the swap partition. If I fail, then I will fall back to
the swap file.
Dotan Cohen
http://song-lirics.com/sl/artist/359/morrison-van-lirics.php
Van Morrison Song Lirics
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Peter Magnusson: "Re: supported 802.11g pcmcia card + WPA support"
- In reply to: Mathieu Chouquet-Stringer: "Re: swap file vs. swap partition"
- Next in thread: Peter Arremann: "Re: swap file vs. swap partition"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|