help
pintofale_at_yahoo.com
Date: 08/08/05
- Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: CD writing tool in FC4"
- Next in thread: Mike McCarty: "Re: help"
- Reply: Mike McCarty: "Re: help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:29:39 -0700 (PDT) To: fedora-list@redhat.com
--- fedora-list-request@redhat.com wrote:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list@redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> fedora-list-request@redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner@redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Agpgart failing? (Dave Jones)
> 2. Configuring printer on FC4 (Pushparaj Shetty)
> 3. Re: Configuring printer on FC4 (alwaleedX)
> 4. OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Gaddis,
> Jeremy L.)
> 5. Re: Agpgart failing? (Roger Grosswiler)
> 6. which rpm provides perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)
> (Ankush Grover)
> 7. BUG: system time is wrong in FC4 (Florin
> Andrei)
> 8. Re: codec 'dfs' (Ping-Wu Zhang)
> 9. Re: making Samba work [new detail] (Paul
> Howarth)
> 10. Re: Running a script at boot [solved] (Dotan
> Cohen)
> 11. How to select nic while bootup? (Roger
> Grosswiler)
> 12. VPN with integrated IPSEC-Solution (Roger
> Grosswiler)
> 13. Re: which rpm provides
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) (Paul Howarth)
> 14. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Mogens
> Kjaer)
> 15. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com? (Paul
> Howarth)
> 16. Re: Someone's being lazy... /dev/dvd not
> linked to /dev/hda
> (Paul Howarth)
> 17. openwbem (Andreas Wahlert)
> 18. Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> (Gaddis, Jeremy L.)
> 19. Re: Update - yum -y not downloading data...
> (Paul Howarth)
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 01:32:51 -0400
> From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: Agpgart failing?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <20050808053251.GD5844@redhat.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Roger
> Grosswiler wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on bootup of a hp netserver, i get this message:
> >
> > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.0 failed
> with error -22...: 1
> > Time(s)
> > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.1
> failed with error -22...:
> > 1 Time(s)
> >
> > can anybody help what this is and how to resolve?
>
> Documentation on the serverworks chipsets is really
> hard
> to get hold of, so this driver hasn't seen a lot of
> debugging
> over the last few years (basically since it was
> first written).
>
> Does this system even have an AGP slot ? If not,
> that's
> probably why its complaining. Either way, given its
> a server,
> it's something you can ignore. The AGP driver on x86
> is only
> useful for 3D graphics.
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:07:52 +0530
> From: Pushparaj Shetty <prajshetty@gmail.com>
> Subject: Configuring printer on FC4
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <69a159a505080722378b8755b@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi,
> How do I configure my printer (HP deskjet 3550) on
> FC4?
>
> Pushparaj
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:41:50 +0300
> From: alwaleedX <alwaleed.x@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Configuring printer on FC4
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <43807d8805080722419ba9ad2@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> use system-config-printer command
>
> On 8/8/05, Pushparaj Shetty <prajshetty@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > How do I configure my printer (HP deskjet 3550) on
> FC4?
> >
> > Pushparaj
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@redhat.com
> > To unsubscribe:
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *************************
> -}» Regards
> -}» Grasp All Lose All
> *************************
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20050808/d73ecdc3/attachment.htm
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:50:51 -0500
> From: "Gaddis, Jeremy L." <jeremy@linuxwiz.net>
> Subject: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: fedora-list <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42F6F2BB.1070907@linuxwiz.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Greetings,
>
> Apparently the IP address of a dedicated server that
> I just purchased is
> on a blacklist that's used by redhat.com's mail
> servers:
>
> Aug 7 18:44:44 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6482]:
> A52F0516BF9:
> to=<fedora-list@redhat.com>,
> relay=mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31],
> delay=10, status=bounced (host
> mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31] said: 550
> 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> Aug 7 18:54:47 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6576]:
> 4CE4E516BF9:
> to=<fedora-list@redhat.com>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> delay=6, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> Aug 7 18:57:22 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6603]:
> 657DE516BF9:
> to=<fedora-list@redhat.com>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> delay=0, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
>
> I got around this by reconfiguring Thunderbird to
> use my mail server
> here at home, which then uses my ISP's SMTP servers
> as a smarthost.
> I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> that my IP address is listed in. I'll have to
> reconfigure Thunderbird
> when I get to work in the morning, however, and
> again when I get home,
> etc. (laptop that goes with me).
>
> Anyone familiar with the RBL's that redhat.com is
> using? Alternatively,
> if there's someone from Red Hat who has the ability
> to get the
> restrictions removed, feel free to contact me
> off-list.
>
> Thanks,
> -j
>
> --
> Jeremy L. Gaddis <jeremy@linuxwiz.net>
>
> "If it's not on fire, it's a software problem."
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 08:09:57 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@gwch.net>
> Subject: Re: Agpgart failing?
> To: "For users of Fedora Core releases"
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <32277.62.2.21.164.1123481397.squirrel@www.gwch.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0200, Roger
> Grosswiler wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > on bootup of a hp netserver, i get this
> message:
> > >
> > > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.0
> failed with error -22...: 1
> > > Time(s)
> > > agpgart-serverworks: probe of 0000:00:00.1
> failed with error
> > -22...:
> > > 1 Time(s)
> > >
> > > can anybody help what this is and how to
> resolve?
> >
> > Documentation on the serverworks chipsets is
> really hard
> > to get hold of, so this driver hasn't seen a lot
> of debugging
> > over the last few years (basically since it was
> first written).
> >
> > Does this system even have an AGP slot ? If not,
> that's
> > probably why its complaining. Either way, given
> its a server,
> > it's something you can ignore. The AGP driver on
> x86 is only
> > useful for 3D graphics.
>
> Hey Dave,
>
> Thanks for replying. No, i don't think there is,
> even there is no
> necessity on this server...gonna ignore this. Thanks
> a lot
> Roger
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:46:34 +0530
> From: Ankush Grover <ankush174@gmail.com>
> Subject: which rpm provides
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <987ccbd305080723166dd016ec@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> hey friends,
>
> Recently I configured CVS on FC3.Now i want to
> configure CVSWeb on
> FC3 so I downloaded the CVSweb and then tried to
> install it .It gave
> me error saying perl-IPC-Run rpm is needed.I
> downloaded the
> perl-IPC-Run rpm but when I tried to install
> perl-IPC-Run it says
>
> "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) is needed by
> perl-IPC-Run-0.79-2.noarch".
>
> I don't know which rpm is needed to fulfill this
> dependency problem.I
> also tried yum install perl-IPC-Run but yum did not
> installed it.
>
> Can anyone tell me the command to know which rpm
> will provide the
> missing dependencies.
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Ankush Grover
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 23:16:23 -0700
> From: Florin Andrei <florin@andrei.myip.org>
> Subject: BUG: system time is wrong in FC4
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1123481783.3286.5.camel@rivendell.home.local>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Please have a look at this bug report...
>
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164711
>
> ...then look at your system and see if it has the
> same problem.
> Essentially, unless ntpdate succeeds, the system
> time gets set wrong.
> Even then, if ntpdate runs fine, some applications
> (Postfix maybe) still
> remain on a different time setting.
>
> E.g. look at the system logs immediately after a
> reboot - you will see a
> big jump in the timestamps after ntp kicks in.
>
> If your system has the same problem, please add your
> observations to the
> bug report.
>
> --
> Florin Andrei
>
> http://florin.myip.org/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 20:16:38 -1000
> From: Ping-Wu Zhang <pwzhangz@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: codec 'dfs'
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <57739e86050807231667a75532@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
>
> On 8/7/05, Andy Pieters <mailings@vlaamse-kern.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > If I recall correctly, you will need a decoder for
> dts. I for instance have a
> > dolby suround decoder, which is connected to my
> soundcard's digital out. The
> > connection is made with a 30€ coaxial cable. And,
> in order for this to work,
> > you must choose the option "pass thru" in xine's
> (or mplayer, or ....) audio
> > config. Even then, you'll beter of if you choose
> the THX sound instead of the
> > dts version (dvd language menu).
> >
> > So, unless you have all that equipment, I suggest
> you configure your player to
> > output stereo sound, and to select the normal
> version of the film.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > Andy
>
> Thanks. I took your advice, clicked on DVD -> audio
> languages and
> changed the selection from Dolby Theatre System to
> Dolby Digital. Now
> I have sound. Great!!! Thanks a whole bunch.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 07:34:00 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: making Samba work [new detail]
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1123482840.2784.65.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 21:24 -0400, Claude Jones
> wrote:
> > On Sat August 6 2005 1:49 pm, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-08-06 at 08:53 -0400, Claude Jones
> wrote:
> > > > While looking at DNS matters this am, I
> checked to see if BIND was
> > > > running:
> > > >
> > > > cj]# service named status
> > > > rndc: decode base64 secret: bad base64
> encoding
> > > >
> > > > Can anyone tell me what this means?
> > >
> > > Your /etc/rndc.key probably hasn't got a proper
> secret in it.
> > >
> >
> > If Jeremy is correct, and I'm running bind-chroot
> (didn't I read along the
> > way, that this is the FC4 default install?), then,
> here's what I've got:
> > In /var/named/chroot/etc there are rdnc.key and
> named.conf -
> > rdnc.key looks like this:
> >
> > key "rndckey" {
> > algorithm hmac-md5;
> > secret
>
"cQQ08BlDIxazAR3ojoKFZWaH8f_long_string.....................";
> > };
> >
> >
> > named.conf - the relevant section - looks like
> this:
> >
> > include "/etc/rndc.key";
> > key "rndckey" {
> > algorithm hmac-md5;
> > secret "sKXHs69HcF7C63BQLGNVQA==";
> > };
>
> There's your problem. The 'include "/etc/rndc.key"'
> is there so that
> your named.conf and rndc.conf can share a secret
> (both include the same
> file). However, your named.conf then introduces a
> new version of the
> same key, with what appears to be too short a
> secret. Try removing the
> lines:
>
> key "rndckey" {
> algorithm hmac-md5;
> secret "sKXHs69HcF7C63BQLGNVQA==";
> };
>
> > The only rdnc.conf file I can find is in /etc
> > It looks like this:
> >
> > options {
> > default-server localhost;
> > default-key "rndckey";
> > };
> >
> > server localhost {
> > key "rndckey";
> > };
> >
> > include "/etc/rndc.key";
> >
> > This is pointing to the wrong file, no? Shouldn't
> it be pointing to the
> > rndc.key file in /var/named/chroot/etc ????
>
> /etc/rndc.key should be a symlink to the one in the
> chroot:
>
> # ls -l /etc/rndc.key
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Jul 20 04:46
> /etc/rndc.key
> -> /var/named/chroot/etc/rndc.key
>
> Paul.
> --
> Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:54:00 +0300
> From: Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Running a script at boot [solved]
> To: akonstam@trinity.edu, For users of Fedora Core
> releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <880dece00508072354410aa9c3@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On 8/8/05, akonstam@trinity.edu
> <akonstam@trinity.edu> wrote:
> > A much simpler way to run a script at boot is to
> put it in the
> > rc.local file.
>
> Thanks, Aaron, and to all the others who suggested
> this and other
> solutions. After googleing every suggestion that was
> proposed, this
> seemed to be the most 'correct'. It works perfect.
>
> For the archives: the full path to the rc.local file
> is:
> /etc/rc.d/rc.local
>
> Dotan Cohen
>
http://lyricslist.com/lyrics/artist_albums/334/mckennitt_loreena.php
> McKennitt, Loreena Song Lyrics
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:02:10 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@gwch.net>
> Subject: How to select nic while bootup?
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <15236.62.2.21.164.1123484530.squirrel@www.gwch.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hey list,
>
> i have 2 laptops, with those i can either connect
> via rj-45 or via
> wireless. I use (at this stage) WPA to authenticate
> on wirless.
>
> The thing is, that fc tries just to init eth0 on
> bootup, not wlan0. So,
> all the following networking functionalities will
> fail.
>
> How can i:
>
> - tell the bootprocess to check also for the
> existance of wlan0 ?
> - start wpa_supplicant only if wlan0 needs to be
> booted?
>
> should i try to handle this issue on the bootscript
> for eth0 itself?
>
> Thanks for any help
> Roger
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:07:23 +0200 (CEST)
> From: "Roger Grosswiler" <roger@gwch.net>
> Subject: VPN with integrated IPSEC-Solution
> To: fedora-list@redhat.com
> Message-ID:
> <21886.62.2.21.164.1123484843.squirrel@www.gwch.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi,
>
> I have several subnets, one is with wireless
> (192.168.0.0/24).
>
> I would like to connect to my internal subnet
> (10.0.0.0/8) using ipsec via
> my firewall, which directs the traffic to internet
> via the default
> gateway. I would also like to use fileservers and
> printers from internal
> lan as i would be in there.
>
> Is there some help/doc about this issue? I've been
> searching, but did not
> find something self-explanatory ;-)
>
> How to handle the ipsec-connection with
> system-config-network? how about
> the firewall-computer accepting the connection from
> my client via ipsec?
>
> Thank you very much for your help. I know, there is
> OpenVPN, but i would
> like to get this running with on-board-ressources
> first...
>
> Roger
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:14:55 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: which rpm provides
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1123485295.2784.67.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 11:46 +0530, Ankush Grover
> wrote:
> > hey friends,
> >
> > Recently I configured CVS on FC3.Now i want to
> configure CVSWeb on
> > FC3 so I downloaded the CVSweb and then tried to
> install it .It gave
> > me error saying perl-IPC-Run rpm is needed.I
> downloaded the
> > perl-IPC-Run rpm but when I tried to install
> perl-IPC-Run it says
> >
> > "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6) is needed by
> perl-IPC-Run-0.79-2.noarch".
> >
> > I don't know which rpm is needed to fulfill this
> dependency problem.I
> > also tried yum install perl-IPC-Run but yum did
> not installed it.
> >
> > Can anyone tell me the command to know which rpm
> will provide the
> > missing dependencies.
>
> Your perl package should provide this dependency.
>
> $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.6)'
> perl-5.8.6-15
>
> What version of perl do you have on your system?
>
> $ rpm -q perl
>
> Paul.
> --
> Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:17:44 +0200
> From: Mogens Kjaer <mk@crc.dk>
> Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42F70718.2070701@crc.dk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii;
> format=flowed
>
> Gaddis, Jeremy L. wrote:
> ...
> > I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> > that my IP address is listed in.
>
> Try feeding your IP number into the "Spam database
> lookup" field
> on: http://dnsstuff.com/
>
> Note: Read the comments at the bottom of the page
> after
> the search.
>
> Mogens
> --
> Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
> Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
> Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
> Email: mk@crc.dk Homepage: http://www.crc.dk
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:22:22 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1123485743.2784.72.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 00:50 -0500, Gaddis, Jeremy L.
> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Apparently the IP address of a dedicated server
> that I just purchased is
> > on a blacklist that's used by redhat.com's mail
> servers:
> >
> > Aug 7 18:44:44 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6482]:
> A52F0516BF9:
> > to=<fedora-list@redhat.com>,
> relay=mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31],
> > delay=10, status=bounced (host
> mx1.redhat.com[66.187.233.31] said: 550
> > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> > Aug 7 18:54:47 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6576]:
> 4CE4E516BF9:
> > to=<fedora-list@redhat.com>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> > delay=6, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> > Aug 7 18:57:22 SP2392b postfix/smtp[6603]:
> 657DE516BF9:
> > to=<fedora-list@redhat.com>,
> relay=mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32],
> > delay=0, status=bounced (host
> mx3.redhat.com[66.187.233.32] said: 550
> > 5.0.0 banned due to spam (in reply to MAIL FROM
> command))
> >
> > I got around this by reconfiguring Thunderbird to
> use my mail server
> > here at home, which then uses my ISP's SMTP
> servers as a smarthost.
> > I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> > that my IP address is listed in. I'll have to
> reconfigure Thunderbird
> > when I get to work in the morning, however, and
> again when I get home,
> > etc. (laptop that goes with me).
>
> Diagnosing such problems is usually easier if you
> say what the actual IP
> address in question is.
>
> Given that no reference to an external list is
> mentioned in the
> rejection message, it's quite possible that it's a
> local list run by
> redhat themselves for their own use.
>
> > Anyone familiar with the RBL's that redhat.com is
> using? Alternatively,
> > if there's someone from Red Hat who has the
> ability to get the
> > restrictions removed, feel free to contact me
> off-list.
>
> You might try postmaster at redhat dot com
>
> Paul.
> --
> Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:35:17 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: Someone's being lazy... /dev/dvd not
> linked to /dev/hda
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1123486518.2784.79.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 06:32 +0200, Andy Pieters
> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > This problem started a while ago but I can't
> recall after what.
> >
> > Now, whenever someone logs in at the console, the
> links to /dev/dvd
> > and /dev/cdrom aren't made, and I have to do that
> manually.
> >
> > Is there any service in particular that is suposed
> to make those symlinks or
> > should the gdm or related take care of that?
>
> The default udev rules for CD/DVD devices usually
> pick this up, but you
> could try creating a file
> /etc/udev/rules.d/10-custom.rules containing:
>
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hdX", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="dvd
> cdrom"
>
> Replace "hdX" with the device name that you point
> your symlinks at,
> which from your Subject: would appear to be "hda".
>
> Paul.
> --
> Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 09:40:42 +0200
> From: Andreas Wahlert <andreas.wahlert@gmx.de>
> Subject: openwbem
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42F70C7A.5050404@gmx.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
>
> Hi List,
>
>
> i'm searching for an openwbem package for FC3 or
> FC4. But i found on
> sourceforge only packages for SuSE Sles (Novell) and
> RH1.
>
>
> There are any experiences with WBEM under FC out
> there??
>
>
>
>
> best regards
>
>
>
> andreas
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 02:43:24 -0500
> From: "Gaddis, Jeremy L." <jeremy@linuxwiz.net>
> Subject: Re: OT: Blacklists used by redhat.com?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID: <42F70D1C.5090807@linuxwiz.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Mogens Kjaer wrote:
> >> I've checked numerous RBL's that I know of, but
> can't seem to find any
> >> that my IP address is listed in.
>
> > Try feeding your IP number into the "Spam database
> lookup" field
> > on: http://dnsstuff.com/
>
> Thanks, I hadn't seen that one before. The IP
> address in question,
> 64.251.22.89 does show up in the SPEWS database.
> Reading their page
> makes me think that trying to get it removed from
> there would be more
> trouble than I feel like dealing with right now.
>
> Thanks,
> -j
>
> --
> Jeremy L. Gaddis <jeremy@linuxwiz.net>
>
> "If it's not on fire, it's a software problem."
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 08:45:00 +0100
> From: Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
> Subject: Re: Update - yum -y not downloading data...
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@redhat.com>
> Message-ID:
> <1123487101.2784.87.camel@laurel.intra.city-fan.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Mon, 2005-08-08 at 07:26 +1000, Mark Knights
> wrote:
> > Here is the yum -y data as requested...
> >
> > Setting up Update Process
> > Setting up repositories
> > updates-released 100%
> |=========================| 951 B 00:00
> > extras 100%
> |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
> > base 100%
> |=========================| 1.1 kB 00:00
> > Reading repository metadata in from local files
> > primary.xml.gz 100%
> |=========================| 136 kB 00:34
> >
>
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/4/i386/repodata/primary.xml.gz:
>
> > [Errno 4] Socket Error: timed out
> > Trying other mirror.
> > Error: failure: repodata/primary.xml.gz from
> extras: [Errno 256] No more
> > mirrors to try.
>
> Increasing the timeout as suggested by Thomas would
> be a good idea. You
> might also want to try using a more local mirror of
> the Fedora Extras
> repository (the default configuration only uses the
> download.fedora.redhat.com site at the moment, which
> is often very
> busy).
>
> Try editing /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-extras.repo and
> change it from this:
>
> [extras]
> name=Fedora Extras $releasever - $basearch
>
#baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
>
mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever
> enabled=1
>
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras
> gpgcheck=1
>
> to this:
>
> [extras]
> name=Fedora Extras $releasever - $basearch
>
#baseurl=http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
>
#mirrorlist=http://fedora.redhat.com/download/mirrors/fedora-extras-$releasever
>
baseurl=http://public.planetmirror.com/pub/fedora/linux/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
>
>
http://mirror.optus.net/fedora/extras/$releasever/$basearch/
> enabled=1
>
gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras
> gpgcheck=1
>
> Paul.
> --
> Paul Howarth <paul@city-fan.org>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 18, Issue 74
> *******************************************
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Paul Howarth: "Re: CD writing tool in FC4"
- Next in thread: Mike McCarty: "Re: help"
- Reply: Mike McCarty: "Re: help"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
