Re: 2.6.14-rc2-git6 vs FC3
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi (zboszor_at_freemail.hu)
Date: 09/27/05
- Previous message: Paul Smith: "Re: Firewall opinion please"
- In reply to: Tony Nelson: "Re: 2.6.14-rc2-git6 vs FC3"
- Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: 2.6.14-rc2-git6 vs FC3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:23:20 +0200 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
Tony Nelson írta:
> At 6:01 PM +0200 9/27/05, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>
>>Tony Nelson írta:
>>
>>>At 1:08 PM +0200 9/27/05, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I have an FC3/x86-64 system and I wanted to try
>>>>the latest-greatest mainstream test kernel.
>>>>The compilation went OK but it didn't boot successfully,
>>>>which seems to be an FC3 bug. The last lines on the
>>>>console are:
>>>>
>>>>-------------------------------------------------
>>>>Switching to new root
>>>>Enforcing mode requested but no policy loaded. Halting now.
>>>>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kil init!
>>>>-------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>At that point, the initrd userspace already started up
>>>>and loaded the required modules, e.g. ext3, SATA drivers, etc.
>>>>
>>>>Is FC3 (or its mkinitrd) that old to be incompatible with
>>>>the latest kernel? At this moment I cannot upgrade to FC4
>>>>to confirm this.
>>>
>>>
>>>That's SELinux. Note that the name SELinux doesn't appear in SELinux error
>>>messages; this may be the Security Mindset at work. The key words in the
>>>error message are "enforcing mode" and "policy". Turn off SELinux'
>>>enforcing mode. If you run any servers you will want to be behind some
>>>other firewall and pay attention to the machine's firewall.
>>
>>Yes, thank you. I know it's SELinux, I already switched off
>>enforcing mode, but I cannot reboot to try it at the moment.
>>My machine is the only computer in the house, so I am a bit
>>uneasy about switching it off.
>
>
> If you aren't running any servers this shouldn't actually make any change,
> as the SELinux Targeted policy only affects servers. Since I don't run any
> servers, I don't have much trouble with SELinux (or much experience with
> SELinux).
I just run sshd so I can look at my machine remotely and cupsd.
Almost nothing else is let into the machine except 3 ports for
the three users who run Azureus.
>>BTW, I am running 2.6.13-rc1-mm1 (kernel-2.6.11-1.14_FC3 is installed)
>>and setting enforcing mode on boot works with these kernel versions.
>>
>>Maybe the RedHat engineers can answer my real question,
>>here it is again:
>>
>>Is FC3 (or its mkinitrd or initscripts) that old
>>to be incompatible with the latest kernel?
>
>
> You didn't report a problem (yet) with the ramdisk. You reported a problem
> with SELinux. You don't have any reason to suspect that your initrd is
> bad, and some reason to think it is good.
I compiled 2.6.14-rc2-git6 the usual mode, taking the .config from
the Fedora kernel and I did:
make oldconfig
make
make modules_install
cp System.map /boot/System.map-<version>
cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/vmlinuz-<version>
mkinitrd /boot/initrd-<version>.img <version>
and I created an entry in grub.conf.
Everything should have been working as it worked so many times.
The only difference is the new kernel.
BTW, I rebooted the new kernel with SELinux permissive mode
and it worked.
Well, X didn't come up, I guess I have to switch off DRI.
Xorg.0.log stopped here:
...
(II) RADEON(0): X context handle = 0x00000001
(II) RADEON(0): [drm] installed DRM signal handler
(II) RADEON(0): [DRI] installation complete
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Paul Smith: "Re: Firewall opinion please"
- In reply to: Tony Nelson: "Re: 2.6.14-rc2-git6 vs FC3"
- Next in thread: Stephen Smalley: "Re: 2.6.14-rc2-git6 vs FC3"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
