Re: High availability mail server options

From: Les Mikesell (lesmikesell_at_gmail.com)
Date: 10/04/05

  • Next message: rowens_at_mdanderson.org: "New to LAMP"
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 16:29:45 -0500
    
    

    On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 15:30, David Hollis wrote:
    > >
    > > > 2. A Maildir setup would likely put each users folders in their home
    > > > directories making it extremely difficult to backup the mail itself
    > > > whereas something like cyrus-imapd has it's own mail store which can be
    > > > put onto it's own partition and could simply be dumped.
    > >
    > > If you are going to the trouble of providing redundancy, I'd think
    > > you'd want to back up all of the user's data, not just email, so
    > > having it all in the same place becomes an advantage for maildirs.
    > > Also, the cyrus database format may have some internal dependencies
    > > that will break if you copy it without shutting down. The maildir
    > > format was designed so the messages were self-contained and do
    > > not need multiple operations to be atomic. Dovecot tries to keep
    > > an index which will most likely be wrong if copied when the user
    > > is active, but it will rebuild it if it becomes inconsistent.
    > >
    >
    > Yeah, the dovecot index stuff I'm hoping really isn't an issue.
    > Hopefully it picks up that things it's out-of-whack and updates itself.
    > As for user data, there isn't any on this system, it's just mail so I
    > only need to replicate the mail partition contents and the LDAP
    > directory part. LDAP will use OpenLDAPs replication of course so that
    > part isn't an issue.

    If you really need down-to-the second replication you might look at
    the raid-over-network options - drbd or raid over enbd devices. But
    a 'warm' backup server kept up to date with frequent rsyncs is
    going to be a lot better than most other ways you would handle
    backup/restore and server crashes.

    -- 
      Les Mikesell
        lesmikesell@gmail.com
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: rowens_at_mdanderson.org: "New to LAMP"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Openldap clustering ?
      ... you're off to a good start with FreeBSD and OpenLDAP. ... you can set up master-master replication between a couple of OpenLDAP ... The really handy thing about LDAP is that you can do quite a reasonable ... Simply specify a series of LDAP servers in the ldap.conf (or ...
      (freebsd-questions)
    • Re: robust OpenLDAP installation using replication in production env
      ... >>In order to get a failsafe environment we need the replication. ... >>specification because write requests to the ldap server should ... > Actually they are redirected to the master. ...
      (comp.os.linux.misc)
    • Netscape Directory Server 6.1 LDAP servers stopped replicating to each other
      ... We run a pair of Netscape directory servers V6.1 on two separate ... boxes and their LDAP entries replicate/synchronize to each other. ... This replication has been running fine for years and couple of ... remove replication agreement. ...
      (SunManagers)
    • Re: ADAM replication via LDAP
      ... ADAM replicates over RPC, not LDAP. ... Joe Richards Microsoft MVP Windows Server Directory Services ... the replication uses. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)
    • Re: Recently added Additional domain controller errors on FRS
      ... > additional Domain Controller, ... >> it doesn't show up on Backup server. ... >> The File Replication Service is having trouble enabling replication from ... >> connection has been established. ...
      (microsoft.public.win2000.active_directory)