Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes
From: Craig White (craigwhite_at_azapple.com)
Date: 10/21/05
- Previous message: Andy Green: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- In reply to: D. D. Brierton: "spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Next in thread: D. D. Brierton: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Reply: D. D. Brierton: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: fedora-list@redhat.com Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 08:07:45 -0700
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 16:02 +0100, D. D. Brierton wrote:
> I'm using FC4 with spamassassin-3.0.4-1.fc4. fetchmail delivers mail to
> a locally running postfix. spamd is running as a service, and spamc is
> called by procmail on my mail. My setup is almost identical to that
> desribed here:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsedViaProcmail
>
> However, despite the fact that I have trained spamassassin on a vast
> amount of both ham and spam using sa-learn, I suspect that Bayesian
> testing is not being applied. I became suspicious that this might be the
> case after receiving over a dozen almost identical messages and despite
> training spamassassin on them they are still not being identified as
> spam. So I started looking at the headers that spamassassin adds to each
> message more closely. Here is the header it added to a recent message
> from this list:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_BY_IP
> autolearn=failed version=3.0.4
>
> And here is an example of an incorrectly identified spam message:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR,
> RCVD_BY_IP autolearn=no version=3.0.4
>
> Now according to this:
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_0_x.html
>
> in the "tests" part of those headers I ought to see one of:
>
> BAYES_00
> BAYES_05
> BAYES_20
> BAYES_40
> BAYES_50
> BAYES_60
> BAYES_80
> BAYES_95
> BAYES_99
>
> Am I just getting confused or is Bayesian checking not happening?
---- try running... spamassassin -D --lint and checking the output of that Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Andy Green: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- In reply to: D. D. Brierton: "spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Next in thread: D. D. Brierton: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Reply: D. D. Brierton: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]