Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes
akonstam_at_trinity.edu
Date: 10/21/05
- Previous message: Michael Hennebry: "what should I do with ant-javadoc.noarch"
- In reply to: jdow: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Next in thread: jdow: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Reply: jdow: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:12:55 -0500 To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 21, 2005 at 10:50:27AM -0700, jdow wrote:
> From: "Alexander Dalloz" <ad+lists@uni-x.org>
>
> >Did you set in local.cf something like following?
>
> >use_bayes 1
> ^^^ good
> >auto_learn 1
> ^^^ IMAO that is poison unless you also change the threshold
> scores for bayes to 'way out there'. These lines will do that:
> ---8<---
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 20.0
> bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.1
>
> ---8<---
The above is interesting since I would think that the default value 12
is too high. Your line says that auto_learning should not happen
unless the score is greater than 20. Why do your think that is good?
-------------------------------------------
Aaron Konstam
Computer Science
Trinity University
telephone: (210)-999-7484
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Michael Hennebry: "what should I do with ant-javadoc.noarch"
- In reply to: jdow: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Next in thread: jdow: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Reply: jdow: "Re: spamassassin doesn't seem to be using bayes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]