Re: amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???

From: oleksandr korneta (mai11ist_at_fastmail.fm)
Date: 10/29/05

  • Next message: oleksandr korneta: "Re: amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???"
    Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:08:30 -0400
    
    

    on 10/29/2005 07:12 AM Andy Pieters wrote:
    > Hi
    >
    > Although it might be quite a bit of work IMHO it is best that you compile
    > amaroK yourself.
    no way. I'm not going to install a tonns of kde*-devel just to compile
    amarok. It is enough that I've installed kdebase, kdelibs, kdeartwork...
     I dont need there packages for anything except the amarok. If I was
    enjoying compiling things myself I would stay on gentoo and never
    install fc.

    more than that, from all this fanciness of amarok the only useful
    feature for me is dynamic playlist. I madman was able to do that amarok
     would never appear on my box.

    > It should be noted that amaroK does NOT depend on MySQL. In fact, amaroK uses
    > standard a PostgreSQL database and can be compiled with MySQL support.
    >
    > amaroK does crash often if there are incosistencies between the several
    > components and dependencies. For that reason, I downloaded and compiled all
    > dependencies seperatly and proceeded to compile amaroK. Always use the same
    > compiler and compile on the same machine.
    well, I thought that yum takes care of that. Isn't this the main feature?

    > Further questions are best addressed to the amaroK mailing list.
    I tried to ask on their irc-channel, they sent me to taglib developers :)

    >
    > With kind regards
    >
    >
    > Andy
    >
    > On Saturday 29 October 2005 06:48, oleksandr korneta wrote:
    >
    >>hey,
    >>
    >>I just discovered amarok-1.3.5-1.fc4@i386.rpm in Fedora Extras, and
    >>wanted to install it hoping that this will solve the bug I have with my
    >>amarok 1.3.3 (it crashes on a 50% of my mp3 saying "TagLib: Compressed
    >>frames are not supported"). In fact I was extremely surprised to see
    >>that it pulls mysql (???) as dependency for itself! Whatta...?
    >>mysql-based mysic manager on a desktop machine? Isn't this a bit too much?
    >>

    -- 
    regards,
    Oleksandr Korneta
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: oleksandr korneta: "Re: amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???
      ... Although it might be quite a bit of work IMHO it is best that you compile ... It should be noted that amaroK does NOT depend on MySQL. ... With kind regards ... > mysql-based mysic manager on a desktop machine? ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???
      ... >It should be noted that amaroK does NOT depend on MySQL. ... >standard a PostgreSQL database and can be compiled with MySQL support. ... >dependencies seperatly and proceeded to compile amaroK. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Amarok & Libmusicbrainz
      ... Still no lookup via amarok though. ... If that doesn't fix it, try ldd /usr/bin/amarokapp and make sure it is ... during the compile, they may not be found at that time either. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: building kde apps (amarok)
      ... Patrick Steiner wrote: ... > i have tryed to compile an svn version of amarok, ... > error that my compiler ist blacklistet. ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Linux vs FreeBSD vs SCO
      ... >> often you install an upgrade, and you find it needs something else, ... >> package, from packages otherwise it has to compile Ruby, and some ... in a Maynard Sandstar floppy controller and hung 8" DD floppies ... The official IBM DOS 2.0 manuals and disks are there too. ...
      (comp.unix.sco.misc)