Re: amarok 1.3.5 and mysql???

From: oleksandr korneta (mai11ist_at_fastmail.fm)
Date: 10/29/05

  • Next message: Michael D. Setzer II: "LVM question. Missing about 11GB of Space.." 
    Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 11:10:26 -0400
To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@redhat.com>

    on 10/29/2005 10:51 AM Andy Pieters wrote:
    > Hi
    >
    > While I admit packages are better to maintain, there is some truth in the
    > words of Michial Peters.
    >
    > A bug should be filed. Bug does not necessarly mean "defect" but can also
    > mean "missing". And in this case the package amaroK without MySql is
    > certainly missing.
    strongly agree. I miss it very much

    >
    > When compiling (...) it is as easy as configure --without-mysql but if
    > packaged then the packager should make a package with MySQL and WITHOUT
    > MySQL, even more so that MySQL support for amaroK is new (not taling about
    > Beta versions)

    exactly!

    >
    > With kind regards
    >
    >
    > Andy
    >
    > On Saturday 29 October 2005 16:16, Rex Dieter wrote:
    >
    >>Michael Peters wrote:
    >>
    >>>The MySQL dependency sounds to me like a packaging mistake, a bug should
    >>>be filed IMHO.
    >>
    >>Nope, just that amarok is built with support for a mysql backend, and
    >>that support requires mysql. (And, AFAIK unfortunately, there's no easy
    >>way to separate it out for those who don't want it).
    >>
    >>-- Rex
    >
    > 

    -- 
regards,
Oleksandr Korneta
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
  • Next message: Michael D. Setzer II: "LVM question. Missing about 11GB of Space.."

    Relevant Pages