Re: Can't bind to dhcp address: Permission denied
From: Hanspeter Roth (hampi_at_rootshell.be)
Date: 10/29/05
- Previous message: Chitlesh GOORAH: "Re: Fedora update info"
- In reply to: Tim: "Re: Can't bind to dhcp address: Permission denied"
- Next in thread: jludwig: "Re: Can't bind to dhcp address: Permission denied"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 23:03:38 +0200 To: fedora-list@redhat.com
On Oct 29 at 23:51, Tim spoke:
> >> I don't recall having any problems getting my DHCPD server running.
> >> You're not trying to run the client and the server on the same PC, are
> >> you?
>
> > Yes I am. On eth0 there is the client running. And on the qemu
> > interfaces tun0, tun1 there is the server running.
>
> I can imagine there being problems with this. e.g. A machine updating
> its own IP over DHCP.
>
> Generally speaking, I'd say that a DHCP server ought to be at a fixed
> address. And that all interfaces on a server ought to have fixed
> addresses, particularly when other machines on the network need to
> configure firewalls to allow interaction with a server, or need to
> obtain networking information.
The DHCP server is listening only on tun0 and tun1 which have their
own fixed address. The DHCP client is running only on the eth0
interface and thus doesn't notice what is going on on tun0 and tun1.
So the client on eth0 can't get a lease which is distributed on tun0
and tun1. The 'internal' machines that run under qemu that are
connected via the tun0 and tun1 interfaces are masqueraded on the
eth0 interface.
-Hanspeter
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Chitlesh GOORAH: "Re: Fedora update info"
- In reply to: Tim: "Re: Can't bind to dhcp address: Permission denied"
- Next in thread: jludwig: "Re: Can't bind to dhcp address: Permission denied"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|