RE: Smartd message: What does it mean?

From: Daniel B. Thurman (dant_at_cdkkt.com)
Date: 10/30/05

  • Next message: Martin, AA6E: "Re: FC4 Can't use Nautilus burn:"
    Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:28:59 -0700
    To: "For users of Fedora Core releases" <fedora-list@redhat.com>
    
    

    Hahahahaha. Sorry folks. I DO appreaciate your comments
    but as I said before, that there is *something else* going
    on, after all... I had no reported problems before. One
    of the respondents clued me in, that this problem was occuring
    AT BOOT TIME. Only ONCE.

    I tried the comprehensive test (smartctl -t long /dev/hdb) and
    there was no reported problems. So when I ran the smartctl -a
    /dev/hdb, I saw that there was a message that the drive may need
    a firmware update with LINKS PROVIDED!!!!!

    THAT IS SO DARN COOL!!!!

    So, I went to the site, downloaded the firmware, updated it,
    and the drive had the updated firmware. I rebooted and smartctl
    reported no problems at boot! I ran the long test again, no problems.

    I saved a few bucks for now.... :-D

    Dan

    -----Original Message-----
    From: fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com
    [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Charles Curley
    Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2005 6:01 PM
    To: For users of Fedora Core releases
    Subject: Re: Smartd message: What does it mean?

    On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 12:02:27AM -0700, jdow wrote:
    > Do not pass go. Do not collect $100. Do not dilly dally around. Get a
    > new drive and move over to it. Your only hope that it is something else
    > is the possibility of a flaky ATA cable. Betting on this is like taking
    > the bad odds at a craps shoot.

    Joanne is correct.

    First off, the fact that smartd is reporting N bad sectors does not
    mean that you only have N bad sectors. You probably also have a bunch
    that the firmware has already either re-allocated (hiding the fact
    that they are bad), or recovered (if the defect is small enough) and
    re-written.

    When a drive is manufactured, it is tested, and a list of bad sectors
    is created. These sectors are re-allocated from spares, and the
    substitution is utterly transparent to the OS.

    When (not if) a new defect occurs, the drive will re-read the sector a
    number of times, and try various tricks to recover the data. The
    smaller the defect, the greater likelihood of recovering the data. If
    the defect is small enough, the drive will simply re-write the sector,
    end of discusion.

    When (not if) the defect gets large enough, the drive will re-allocate
    a substitute sector from a list of spares, and mark the old one as
    bad. That list of spares will eventually be exhausted, which can
    happen in a matter of minutes.

    However, the fact that the drive has enough bad sectors that the
    firmware is reporting them to you means that you have more bad sectors
    than there were on the drive since it was manufactured. Your drive is
    warning you that it is about to die.

    Yes, it may take several years to die. On the other hand it could take
    15 minutes. 15 seconds.

    Now, how much do you want to bet that it will be toward the several
    years end of things?

    How much is your time worth? I'd rather spend a few bucks on a new
    hard drive, copy the data over, and be good to go than try to recover
    data from a dieing drive. Been there, done that, got the
    T-shirt. Been paid big bucks to do it for other people.

    Do as the lady says. Now.

    Then start doing regular backups.

    -- 
    Charles Curley                  /"\    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
    Looking for fine software       \ /    Respect for open standards
    and/or writing?                  X     No HTML/RTF in email
    http://www.charlescurley.com    / \    No M$ Word docs in email
    Key fingerprint = CE5C 6645 A45A 64E4 94C0  809C FFF6 4C48 4ECD DFDB
    -- 
    No virus found in this incoming message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date: 10/28/2005
     
        
    -- 
    No virus found in this outgoing message.
    Checked by AVG Free Edition.
    Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date: 10/28/2005
     
    -- 
    fedora-list mailing list
    fedora-list@redhat.com
    To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
    

  • Next message: Martin, AA6E: "Re: FC4 Can't use Nautilus burn:"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Smartd message: What does it mean?
      ... Charles Curley wrote: ... > firmware is reporting them to you means that you have more bad sectors ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: Removal of bad sectors marked by CHKDSK
      ... is still reporting "8kb in bad sectors" ... in the report after chkdsk /F is run, ... Norton's disk doctor, does the same, but adds free space & security ... which is why I cannot figure out why the OS is still reporting them... ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: Removal of bad sectors marked by CHKDSK
      ... > It sounds like a bad hard disk and you should back up pertinent data and replace it. ... > | descriptors to a CHKDSK run...(I checked the box for it to do this, ... > | which is why I cannot figure out why the OS is still reporting them... ... When bad sectors are so marked it is ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: chkdsk /r and surface scan
      ... the process did indeed "fix" bad sectors. ... then that's reason enough to not trust ChkDsk. ... Now it may be impossible to switch off the HD's own firmware defect ... because all defects are hidden by the firmware. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
    • Re: chkdsk /r and surface scan
      ... > the process did indeed "fix" bad sectors. ... > tell you it did so, then that's reason enough to not trust ChkDsk. ... > Now it may be impossible to switch off the HD's own firmware defect ... because all defects are hidden by the firmware. ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)