Re: mail confusion
From: Derek Martin (code_at_pizzashack.org)
Date: 10/31/05
- Previous message: Antonio Olivares: "RE: Linux killer!"
- In reply to: Tim: "Re: mail confusion"
- Next in thread: Tim: "Re: mail confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:12:43 -0500 To: fedora-list@redhat.com
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 11:38:50PM +1030, Tim wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 12:06 -0500, Derek Martin wrote:
> > Red Hat has configured some of its software to use
> > "localhost.localdomain" (which I always thought was brain-damaged), so
> > you'll need that in there as well.
>
> I can see why they've done something *like* that, as there's some
> networking things that will insist on there being at least one dot in
> the name, but I would have done it differently.
Hmm... can you provide an example? I've never seen such a beast that
I'm aware of. And IMO you shouldn't... localhost is localhost -- it
isn't in a domain; that's the whole point. The entire 127.0.0.0/8
network refers to your local machine. I'm inclined to think that
software which requires a domain is broken.
-- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Previous message: Antonio Olivares: "RE: Linux killer!"
- In reply to: Tim: "Re: mail confusion"
- Next in thread: Tim: "Re: mail confusion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|