Re: fedora-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 104



hi
i'm new to linux .
i've just got a new window manager --enlightenment.can somebody please
help me with the instructions about how to install it on my FC3.

On 12/12/05, fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
<fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: SOLVED: sane-backends problem with FC4 and x86_64
> (Erik P. Olsen)
> 2. Wrong fs type detected (David J. Bakeman)
> 3. Re: rootkit? (Gene Heskett)
> 4. Re: rootkit? (Scot L. Harris)
> 5. Re: rootkit? (Gene Heskett)
> 6. Firefox 1.5 (John Francis)
> 7. Re: Cups Troubles (Tod Thomas)
> 8. Re: rootkit? (Michael A. Peters)
> 9. Re: rootkit? (Ralf Corsepius)
> 10. Re: Wrong fs type detected (Terry Polzin)
> 11. cannot find canonical DNS on slmodem PPP connection
> (Globe Trotter)
> 12. Re: Wrong fs type detected (Jeff Vian)
> 13. Re: Bug report requests for Fedora build of OpenOffice.org
> software (Jeff Vian)
> 14. Alsa (Sound) (CodeHeads)
> 15. Re: Alsa (Sound) (Dave Jones)
> 16. Re: Alsa (Sound) (CodeHeads)
> 17. Re: Alsa (Sound) (Dave Jones)
> 18. Question about Java on Fedora 4 (Hoffmann)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:18:42 +0100
> From: "Erik P. Olsen" <erik@xxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: SOLVED: sane-backends problem with FC4 and x86_64
> To: erik@xxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases
> <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1134343122.4569.13.camel@xxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 00:41 +0100, Erik P. Olsen wrote:
> > Sane is implemented in FC4/x86_64 with one x86_64 frontend and two (i386
> > and x86_64) backends. I guess the i386 backends are there to interface
> > to i386 only frontends and the x86_64 backends interface xsane and
> > scanimage.
> >
> > My problem with this approch is that I need to upgrade sane-backends to
> > the latest level which I would normally do by compiling them according
> > to the instructions found on the sane projects web pages. However, such
> > compilations will only affect the i386 elements and therefore I'll not
> > have the upgrade I thought. Does anybody know how I should compile the
> > x86_64 version? The sane-project doesn't know and refer to the Fedora
> > team packagers who apparently have done it all by themselves.
> >
> > Would a decent circumvention be to erase the sane packages from the
> > system and compile new ones to an i386 platform or will that not work?
> Following applies a fix to the x86_64 version of sane-backends assuming
> it has been copied into the standard source:
>
> 1. rpm -e --nodeps sane-backends-1.0.15-9.x86_64
> 2. CFLAGS="-m64" ./configure --sysconfdir=/etc --libdir=/usr/lib64 --
> prefix=/usr
> 3. make
> 4. make install
>
> --
> Regards,
> Erik P. Olsen
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 17:52:41 -0800
> From: "David J. Bakeman" <dbakeman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Wrong fs type detected
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <439CD7E9.6090300@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> I have a external firewire drive formatted as ext3 under RH7.2. When I
> plug it in to my new FC4 machine it complains with the following:
>
> FAT: Did not find valid FSINFO signature.
> Found signature1 0x00000000 signature2 0x00000000 (sector = 1)
> FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sdb1)
> invalid access to FAT (entry 0x00c0000f)
> File system has been set read-only
>
>
> I have to manually mount it as ext3 and everything is fine. I have two
> other external firewire drives one formatted FAT32 and the other ext3
> both of these are recognized correctly and automatically mounted.
> Here's the output from fdisk for the drive that isn't recognized:
>
> Disk /dev/sdc: 203.9 GB, 203927060480 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24792 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sdc1 1 24792 199141708+ 83 Linux
>
>
> Any ideas??
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:12:56 -0500
> From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rootkit?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <200512112112.56210.gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 17:50, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53, David Cary Hart wrote:
> >> Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and Ohio.
> >> I hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted viral
> >> attack on January 5.
> >
> >Sure, converted all Microsoft systems to Linux some time ago,
> > including my laptops. :)
>
> Uh huh, and this was a linux system that got kitted. Sitting on the
> next port of a 100baset switch being fed by the router.
>
> Jim has collected all the stuff ( the logs weren't cleaned a bit, which
> helps a lot) and will tarball and fwd it to the requester who asked
> for it as soon as the re-install is done.
>
> --
> Cheers, Gene
> People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should use this
> address: <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> which bypasses vz's
> stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
> Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
> message by Gene Heskett are:
> Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:19:29 -0500
> From: "Scot L. Harris" <webid@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rootkit?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1134353969.3324.147.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 December 2005 17:50, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> > >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53, David Cary Hart wrote:
> > >> Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and Ohio.
> > >> I hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted viral
> > >> attack on January 5.
> > >
> > >Sure, converted all Microsoft systems to Linux some time ago,
> > > including my laptops. :)
> >
> > Uh huh, and this was a linux system that got kitted. Sitting on the
> > next port of a 100baset switch being fed by the router.
> >
>
> Well he was asking about the sober virus that is suppose to hit out
> there again January 5th. As far as I know that virus targets Windows
> systems only. :)
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:29:24 -0500
> From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rootkit?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <200512112129.24625.gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 21:19, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >> On Sunday 11 December 2005 17:50, Scot L. Harris wrote:
> >> >On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53, David Cary Hart wrote:
> >> >> Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and
> >> >> Ohio. I hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted
> >> >> viral attack on January 5.
> >> >
> >> >Sure, converted all Microsoft systems to Linux some time ago,
> >> > including my laptops. :)
> >>
> >> Uh huh, and this was a linux system that got kitted. Sitting on
> >> the next port of a 100baset switch being fed by the router.
>
> And my fingers didn't keep up with my mind above, I intended to say it
> was sitting on the next port of the switch, beside 2 other winduhs
> boxes. The wifey uses windows in her teaching too and the son has a
> laptop in his room too.
>
> >Well he was asking about the sober virus that is suppose to hit out
> >there again January 5th. As far as I know that virus targets Windows
> >systems only. :)
>
> Yeah, the 5th should be interesting, if only from the screaming of all
> the oxes that get gored that day. From people who have this attitude
> that 'my box is safe, its never been bothered before has it?'
>
> --
> Cheers, Gene
> People having trouble with vz bouncing email to me should use this
> address: <gene.heskett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> which bypasses vz's
> stupid bounce rules. I do use spamassassin too. :-)
> Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above
> message by Gene Heskett are:
> Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:54:14 +1100
> From: John Francis <john.francis@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Firefox 1.5
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <a56beb020512111854x2b433396q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> So are we going to see Firefox 1.5 released for FC4?
>
> --
> Kind regards,
>
> John Francis
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051212/b6c5b3f5/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:53:59 -0500
> From: Tod Thomas <tod@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Cups Troubles
> To: Ankush Grover <ankush174@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <439CE647.2060405@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Ankush Grover wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 12/8/05, *Tod Thomas* <tod@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tod@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Tod Thomas wrote:
> > > I am trying to print from FC4 client to WinXP workstation with a
> > share
> > > defined to an Epson Stylus Photo RX600 printer. I am trying to
> > connect
> > > with a user account defined on the XP box.
> > >
> > > In the CUPs web GUI when it comes time to configure the Device
> > URI I'm
> > > specifying smb://user:password/ipaddress/sharename
> > <smb://user:password/ipaddress/sharename>. This should work,
> > > in fact I have validated the connectivity to the XP box with
> > smbclient.
> > > The problem is I have special characters in the password,
> > particularly
> > > the '@' symbol. I have a feeling that is throwing CUPs off. I
> > tried
> > > making the change directly to printers.conf but that didn't make a
> > > difference.
> >
> >
> > Make that: smb://user:password@ipaddress/sharename
> >
> >
> > hey,
> >
> >
> >
> > You can also print normally means configure the printer through
> > system-config-printer and set the queue type as samba.
>
>
> Thanks! That's what I needed.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:27:41 -0800
> From: "Michael A. Peters" <mpeters@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rootkit?
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <1134358062.5525.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 16:53 -0500, David Cary Hart wrote:
>
> > >
> > Just checking the DB, cebridge has zombie problems in TX and Ohio. I
> > hope you all have your defenses hardened for a predicted viral attack
> > on January 5.
>
> My birthday :D
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 04:51:25 +0100
> From: Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: rootkit?
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1134359485.28658.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 17:33 +0000, James Wilkinson wrote:
> > Michael A. Peters wrote:
> > > Sun use to (still does?) allow you to enter an md5sum and it would tell
> > > you exactly what file it matched, along with what patch level.
> >
> > Ralf Corsepius replied:
> > > rpm based systems have "rpm {-V|--verify}", which provide a comparable
> > > feature.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this is pretty useless if you can't trust the RPM
> > database.
> True, nevertheless, it still gives valuable hints when trying to find
> out whether you have been comprised.
>
> Also, as compromising the RPM-db requires root access, compromising the
> RPM-db is still one level more unlikely to happen than finding mal-ware
> in a user's home or tmp.
>
> > And on a compromised machine, you can't trust the RPM database.
> Sure, but at some point, paranoia has got to end and you'll have to
> trust something.
>
> > And, unfortunately, prelinking means that you can't even compare them to
> > a "known good" machine.
> Yep.
>
> Wrt. this, prelinking can be considered a security risk, as well as some
> of RH's packaging conventions (e.g. allowing unowned file and using
> "alternatives").
>
> So I agree, rpm -V is of very limited use, but it is way from being
> useless.
>
> Ralf
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:00:44 -0500
> From: Terry Polzin <fox3ec208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Wrong fs type detected
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <200512112300.48006.fox3ec208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On Sunday December 11 2005 20:52, David J. Bakeman wrote:
> > I have a external firewire drive formatted as ext3 under RH7.2. When I
> > plug it in to my new FC4 machine it complains with the following:
> >
> > FAT: Did not find valid FSINFO signature.
> > Found signature1 0x00000000 signature2 0x00000000 (sector = 1)
> > FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sdb1)
> > invalid access to FAT (entry 0x00c0000f)
> > File system has been set read-only
> >
> >
> > I have to manually mount it as ext3 and everything is fine. I have two
> > other external firewire drives one formatted FAT32 and the other ext3
> > both of these are recognized correctly and automatically mounted.
> > Here's the output from fdisk for the drive that isn't recognized:
> >
> > Disk /dev/sdc: 203.9 GB, 203927060480 bytes
> > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24792 cylinders
> > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> >
> > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > /dev/sdc1 1 24792 199141708+ 83 Linux
> >
> >
> > Any ideas??
> When was the last time fsck was run against the partition
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051211/a156a408/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:03:58 -0800 (PST)
> From: Globe Trotter <itsme_410@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: cannot find canonical DNS on slmodem PPP connection
> To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20051212050358.44291.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I have a strange problem on a PPP connection. I am using slmodem (logging in
> from India) on travel. I get through fine, using slmodem on my PCTEL modem,
> and
> get the following, but get a can not find canonical DNS. Hence I can not
> connect to the web using linux. Any suggestions?
>
> By the way, here are some details:
>
> $ ifconfig
> lo Link encap:Local Loopback
> inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
> UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
> RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
> RX bytes:708 (708.0 b) TX bytes:708 (708.0 b)
>
> ppp0 Link encap:Point-to-Point Protocol
> inet addr:61.2.0.216 P-t-P:61.0.128.83 Mask:255.255.255.255
> UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:7 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:80 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:3
> RX bytes:302 (302.0 b) TX bytes:5710 (5.5 KiB)
>
>
>
>
> Also, this is the transaction when I used wvdial:
>
>
>
>
> --> WvDial: Internet dialer version 1.54.0
> --> Initializing modem.
> --> Sending: ATZ
> ATZ
> OK
> --> Sending: ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 +FCLASS=0
> ATQ0 V1 E1 S0=0 &C1 &D2 +FCLASS=0
> OK
> --> Modem initialized.
> --> Sending: ATDT172222
> --> Waiting for carrier.
> ATDT172222
> CONNECT 44000
> --> Carrier detected. Waiting for prompt.
> Welcome to UTStarcom Total Control HiPer ARC (TM)
> Networks That Go The Distance (TM)
> login:
> --> Looks like a login prompt.
> --> Sending: username
> Password:
> --> Looks like a password prompt.
> --> Sending: (password)
> ~[7f]}#@!}!}!} }?}!}$}%j}"}&[7f][7f][7f][7f]}%}&])S}6}'}"}(}"}1}$}%j}3}#}
> ]H~
> --> PPP negotiation detected.
> --> Starting pppd at Sat Dec 10 18:00:49 2005
> --> pid of pppd: 2704
> --> Using interface ppp0
> --> local IP address 61.2.0.216
> --> remote IP address 61.0.128.83
> --> primary DNS address 61.0.128.65
> --> secondary DNS address 61.0.0.5
>
>
> And I get the following when I use fetchmail:
>
> .......
> fetchmail: couldn't find canonical DNS name of mailserver
>
> When I use firefox or dillo, I also get the same thing. When I try to ssh
> out
> to my work machine, I get temporary failure in name resolution.
>
> Any suggestions/help? Btw, I am running Fedora Core 4 and the latest version
> of
> slmodem.
>
> Many thanks and best wishes!
> Globe.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:05:44 -0600
> From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Wrong fs type detected
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1134363944.4342.2.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 23:00 -0500, Terry Polzin wrote:
> > On Sunday December 11 2005 20:52, David J. Bakeman wrote:
> > > I have a external firewire drive formatted as ext3 under RH7.2. When I
> > > plug it in to my new FC4 machine it complains with the following:
> > >
> > > FAT: Did not find valid FSINFO signature.
> > > Found signature1 0x00000000 signature2 0x00000000 (sector = 1)
> > > FAT: Filesystem panic (dev sdb1)
> > > invalid access to FAT (entry 0x00c0000f)
> > > File system has been set read-only
> > >
> > >
> > > I have to manually mount it as ext3 and everything is fine. I have two
> > > other external firewire drives one formatted FAT32 and the other ext3
> > > both of these are recognized correctly and automatically mounted.
> > > Here's the output from fdisk for the drive that isn't recognized:
> > >
> > > Disk /dev/sdc: 203.9 GB, 203927060480 bytes
> > > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 24792 cylinders
> > > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
> > >
> > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> > > /dev/sdc1 1 24792 199141708+ 83 Linux
> > >
> > >
> > > Any ideas??
>
> Interesting that the error about FAT above is on /dev/sdb1 and you
> showed the fdisk output from /dev/sdc.
>
> Are you sure you are looking at the error on the proper drive.?
>
>
> > When was the last time fsck was run against the partition
> >
> > --
> > fedora-list mailing list
> > fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> > To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 23:09:58 -0600
> From: Jeff Vian <jvian10@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Bug report requests for Fedora build of OpenOffice.org
> software
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <1134364198.4342.6.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 22:10 +0300, Strong wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 19:40:35 -0400 Peter Arremann <loony@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > For one or another reason a distribution repackages code and then the
> > > upstream providers will not help you out.
> > First, thanks Peter for explanation on how things are going on with the
> > package developers and their relation on our bug reports of their
> > products.
> >
> > but the question arises, How to live farther? Or, in other words. What
> > is the distribution that can be used in order to get help from the
> > package developers?
> >
> > Thank You for You answer.
> >
> > PS Assuredly, multiple distributions is a Great Evil!
> >
>
> This is true only if you WANT to be told exactly what you can and cannot
> have and how to use it.
>
> Multiple distributions is a result of the freedom to choose what to make
> available (distributors) and to choose what to use (users).
>
> Also, note that you are not locked into using only what is packaged in
> the distribution, but can add or delete packages as you choose.
>
> Therefore, the answer to your question is: Install the package directly
> from the developers and then you may get their support.
>
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Strong.
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:15:38 -0500
> From: CodeHeads <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Alsa (Sound)
> To: Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <439D077A.5080605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hello all,
> I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I found
> was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are some
> screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa
>
> Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system enabled.
> Am I missing something??
>
> ~WILL~
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:18:23 -0500
> From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Alsa (Sound)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20051212051822.GA3052@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:15:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote:
> > Hello all,
> > I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I found
> > was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are some
> > screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa
> >
> > Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system enabled.
> > Am I missing something??
>
> Does toggling the 'external amplifier' make it work ?
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:26:38 -0500
> From: CodeHeads <ch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Alsa (Sound)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <439D0A0E.9050006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:15:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote:
> > > Hello all,
> > > I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I
> found
> > > was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are some
> > > screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa
> > >
> > > Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system enabled.
> > > Am I missing something??
> >
> > Does toggling the 'external amplifier' make it work ?
> >
> > Dave
>
> I would do that in the alsamixer in the shell...right?? Sorry stupid
> question LOL I usually do not mess with the sounds system in linux. I
> just started working with it on my desktops.
>
> ~WILL~
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:33:14 -0500
> From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Alsa (Sound)
> To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20051212053314.GB3052@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:26:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote:
> > Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:15:38AM -0500, CodeHeads wrote:
> > > > Hello all,
> > > > I have been searching and finding no solution to my problem. All I
> found
> > > > was that Alsa is muted by default. Well, it is unmuted. Here are
> some
> > > > screen shots of my settings. http://code-heads.com/alsa
> > > >
> > > > Also I checked in the contol panel and I have the sound system
> enabled.
> > > > Am I missing something??
> > >
> > > Does toggling the 'external amplifier' make it work ?
> > >
> > > Dave
> >
> > I would do that in the alsamixer in the shell...right?? Sorry stupid
> > question LOL I usually do not mess with the sounds system in linux. I
> > just started working with it on my desktops.
>
> Or kmix. (Though which of 'red' or 'yellow' means set/unset is lost on me
> (I use gnome). I'm totally in awe of the KDE developers hci skills on that
> one.
> They must be great fun at parties.
> "Did you switch the music on?" "Yellow!"
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:36:57 -0800 (PST)
> From: Hoffmann <oasf2004@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Question about Java on Fedora 4
> To: Fedora-List <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID: <20051212053657.31688.qmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have no previous experience with java programming, and my questions are
> related to java on FC4. My OS is Fedora x86_64 and my processor is an Intel
> EM64T. I realized that my Java versionis the 1.4.2, and I was not able to
> upgrade it by using yum. My questions are:
>
> (1) Could anyone, please, let me know how could I upgrade java to the
> latest version? Is the best option to wait for the newest version be
> released by yum?
>
> (2) The most impottant question: What about the Java Virtual Machine? I
> realized that some applications I would like to install/run are generating a
> warning about not being able to find the JVM on my machine? How could I
> solve this problem? Is it already installed? If affirmative, how could I
> make JVM be recognized by those applications?
>
> Thanks a lot in advance!
> Best,
> Hoffmann
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Shopping
> Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20051211/fe2cb495/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 22, Issue 104
> ********************************************
>


--
sujit

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Open Office
    ... Portableapps.com's official release of each package is usually a minor release ... RE: linux. ... Especially as WINE (the windows emulator that lets you run windows programs) ... install on Linux will average 10x as long as on winders. ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption (warning: long rant follows)
    ... Windows also are easy to install. ... it just added another package manager to the list. ... Linux, as a community, is serious business and able to help them make ... that true teamwork can win. ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: Stronghelp - can I change location set by Packman?
    ... it was needed to install a package though. ... RISC OS desktop. ... Simpler for the newbies arriving from Linux, ...
    (comp.sys.acorn.apps)
  • Re: Best Linux version to port from OpenServer 5.0.5/6
    ... 5.0.5/6, to Linux. ... > something that doesn install aload of crap you don't need... ... > The package management allows easy installs of packages ... Debian will never die!,See ...
    (comp.unix.sco.misc)
  • Re: Windows 8 is a catastrophe - Gabe Newell
    ... Aside from the fact that many users aren't provided with install disks ... A 5 year old could successfully install windows. ... Whatever his reasons for thinking of Linux, he's going to look at the ... If you want the largest package base, ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action)