Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Gilboa Davara <gilboada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 23:53:30 +0200
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 14:23 -0700, Robin Laing wrote:
> Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 16:42 -0800, Ezra Nugroho wrote:
> >
> >>http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/index.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > Eeeek! Not Tomshardware.
> > In my experience, his views always seemed to follow how-ever advertises
> > the most on this site. (Which is usually Intel)
>
> Well this article does not have a pro Intel conclusion.
>
> http://www.tomshardware.com/2005/11/21/the_mother_of_all_cpu_charts_2005/index.html
>
> I am also an AMD man and from what I have read, AMD is not producing
> more cutting edge and top line processors than Intel.
>
Umm...? By "more cutting edge" you mean what?
Your own link seem to suggest that Intel is behind the performance
curve.
(And I still don't trust THG [Tom's Hardware Guid])
Gilboa
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Robin Laing
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Christofer C. Bell
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Claude Jones
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- References:
- amd .vs intel....
- From: bruce
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Claude Jones
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Ezra Nugroho
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Gilboa Davara
- Re: amd .vs intel....
- From: Robin Laing
- amd .vs intel....
- Prev by Date: Re: Should the USB subsystem unmount a disk when disconnected?
- Next by Date: Re: Key Codes for setkeycodes
- Previous by thread: Re: amd .vs intel....
- Next by thread: Re: amd .vs intel....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|