is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:40:56 +1030
Hi,
I don't use spamassassin, I find it more of a hindrance than a help, so
I wanted to remove it.
yum remove spamassassin
...[snip]...
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Removing:
spamassassin i386 3.0.4-2.fc4 installed 1.8 M
Removing for dependencies:
evolution i386 2.2.3-2.fc4 installed 24 M
And trying "rpm -e spamassassin" produces the same sort of response.
Surely this is a stupid dependency? It's supposedly *optional* whether
you use anti-spam filtering in Evolution (I've never allowed it's junk
mail checking), why should it *have* to be present?
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Amadeus W. M.
- Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: John Summerfied
- Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Prev by Date: [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon" - Where to find that module?!
- Next by Date: Open Office crashed on Power PC G4
- Previous by thread: [drm] failed to load kernel module "radeon" - Where to find that module?!
- Next by thread: Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|