Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: John Summerfied <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:36:30 +0800
Tim wrote:
Hi,
I don't use spamassassin, I find it more of a hindrance than a help, so I wanted to remove it.
yum remove spamassassin ...[snip]... ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Removing: spamassassin i386 3.0.4-2.fc4 installed 1.8 M Removing for dependencies: evolution i386 2.2.3-2.fc4 installed 24 M
And trying "rpm -e spamassassin" produces the same sort of response.
Surely this is a stupid dependency? It's supposedly *optional* whether you use anti-spam filtering in Evolution (I've never allowed it's junk mail checking), why should it *have* to be present?
So you _can_ use the filtering.
--
Cheers John
-- spambait 1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/
do not reply off-list
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: KDE3.5: Failure in changing login scheme...
- Next by Date: kpilot question
- Previous by thread: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Next by thread: Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|