Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:33:42 +1030
Tim:
>> Surely this is a stupid dependency? It's supposedly *optional* whether
>> you use anti-spam filtering in Evolution (I've never allowed it's junk
>> mail checking), why should it *have* to be present?
John Summerfied:
> So you _can_ use the filtering.
Then, if I want to, I can load the required files onto my system.
It's as daft as having to install 100 dictionaries for a spell checker,
because it insists. Never mind that you only speak one language. We
had that silliness with Gaim a while back, insisting on you installing
some optional spell checker - made all the more worse by the difficulty
in finding the package it needed.
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Tim
- Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: John Summerfied
- is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why questions don't get answered, or "No, I've already RTFM, tell me the answer!"
- Next by Date: Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Previous by thread: Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Next by thread: Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Index(es):