Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Tim <ignored_mailbox@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2006 04:36:22 +1030
On Sat, 2005-12-31 at 11:01 -0500, Amadeus W. M. wrote:
> I haven't checked, but I bet there must be a compile option in the
> evolution source that allows you to disable spamassassin. If I really
> wanted to get rid of spamassassin, I'd download the evolution src.rpm,
> hack it, change the spec file and rebuild it. But probably not worth
> the trouble.
I'm considering it, because it's taking ages for filtering to complete
(nothing elaborate, either), and I'm registering DNS look-ups for all
the addresses in messages.
An undisabled spamassasin, despite my configuration options, is looking
like the culprit.
--
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Tim
- Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- From: Amadeus W. M.
- is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Prev by Date: Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Next by Date: Re: Disk defragmenter in Linux
- Previous by thread: Re: is evolution really dependent on spamassassin?
- Next by thread: Open Office crashed on Power PC G4
- Index(es):