Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:41:12 -0600
Franck Y wrote:
Hi everyone, I ve got a strange behavior with bz2 and gzip. When i compress a small folder around 225 Mo the compression goes to 49 Mo for gzip 46 mo for bzip2
When i compress a bigger folder around 5 Go the compression goes to 2.6 Go for gzip 3.1 mo for bzip2
[snip]
Not surprising at all. It is a theorem that, for any compression algorithm which makes the compressed version of some file smaller than the uncompressed version, there is a file for which the compressed version is *larger* than the uncompressed version. Compression algorithms all make assumptions about the form of the input data. How well any given collection of files matches those assumptions determines how well the algorithm works on that collection.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- From: Deron Meranda
- Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- References:
- Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- From: Franck Y
- Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- Prev by Date: Re: configure Startup services
- Next by Date: Re: Eclipse & Oracle10g-EE
- Previous by thread: Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- Next by thread: Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|