Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 12:58:42 -0600
Mike McCarty wrote:
Franck Y wrote:
Hi everyone, I ve got a strange behavior with bz2 and gzip. When i compress a small folder around 225 Mo the compression goes to 49 Mo for gzip 46 mo for bzip2
When i compress a bigger folder around 5 Go the compression goes to 2.6 Go for gzip 3.1 mo for bzip2
[snip]
Not surprising at all. It is a theorem that, for any compression algorithm which makes the compressed version of some file
Let me ammend that...
"... for any *lossless* compression algorithm..."
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- From: Franck Y
- Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- From: Mike McCarty
- Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why questions don't get answered, or "No, I've already RTFM, tell me the answer!"
- Next by Date: Re: Is 64 bit Fedora OK? With which CPU?
- Previous by thread: Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- Next by thread: Re: Gzip better than Bz2 ? Normal?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|