Re: Delivery time expiration



At 5:10 AM +1030 2/13/06, Tim wrote:
On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 16:15 +0100, Antonio Montagnani wrote:
Why sometimes do I receive this message from my ISP's mail server
related to some e-mail to fedora-list and the e-mail is not
delivered??
It happens only with fedora-list

Specifically, I think you get it with the Fedora list because of one of
it's anti-spam techniques (grey listing): Rejecting some mail, for the
moment, for it to be re-sent in a while. Normal mail servers will do
that, spammers won't.

In general, it means that the mail couldn't be delivered at that time,
for one reason or another (e.g. the server was too busy, the in box was
full, etc.), and that it should be sent again, a while later. After
some time of being unable to send a message, and probably after a
certain number of attempts, the mail server would declare it to be
undeliverable. It appears that yours doesn't have enough patience.

This can happen with greylisting if your MSP has multiple outgoing servers
and uses a different one for each try. Each time it will get a new
greylisting, and none of the attempts will succeed the first time. If
there are enough outgoing servers, then the message may time out before
getting back to a server that already attempted the message (and would pass
greylisting this time).

I wonder if greylisting pays any attention to MX records? (I just don't
wonder enough to look for myself.)
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:' <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
' <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Which greylist milter is least maintenance
    ... If you have multiple mail servers and MX records a sending system, on receiving a tempfail, will try the next. ... If that also has greylisting it will move to the next until it has exhausted your mx list. ... If you have greylisting enabled on one but not all MX servers you effectively have no greylisting for sending systems that are smart enough to retry. ... If you have greylisting on all your systems and they each maintain their own database you effectively have greylisting from hell. ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)
  • Re: Which greylist milter is least maintenance
    ... their own database you effectively have greylisting from hell. ... Example.com has 60 mail servers. ...
    (comp.mail.sendmail)
  • Re: Fwd: [Contributors] Microsoft Windows Is Offically Broken
    ... >> needed to have running in wine. ... > has been good for all except those that use Fedora because it was free. ... We have had our own local FreeBSD repository ... have much faster access to all the files required to build new servers ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: How do you know?
    ... > Pretty much everyone here has made the choice to use Fedora over the other ... > I used to run SuSE on all my servers and Red Hat on my ... > the server side tools made it the best choice for servers. ... > Then came an ill fated day when I build two brand new DNS servers on SuSE ...
    (Fedora)
  • Re: How do you know?
    ... > Pretty much everyone here has made the choice to use Fedora over the other ... > I used to run SuSE on all my servers and Red Hat on my ... > the server side tools made it the best choice for servers. ... > Then came an ill fated day when I build two brand new DNS servers on SuSE ...
    (Fedora)