Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:40:41 -0600
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 17:13, Mike McCarty wrote:
Its a 2.4gHz Athlon box.
Something wrong with your 58 second machine there Mike :-(
----
take his commentary with a grain of salt and recognize that he is using
FC-2 which I am sure few will argue was better abandoned for FC-3
Are you suggesting that FC4 would load it any faster?
Probably but I think you have a specific problem on that machine.
I've got a dual pII-450 running FC1 that starts OO in about 10
seconds. The first instance of Firefox with google as the home
page takes about 5 seconds, another window about 2. Does
hdparm -T -t show somewhere near 30MB/sec for buffered reads?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- References:
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Tony Dietrich
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Craig White
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Prev by Date: Re: Potential kernel-2.6.15-1.1830_FC4 problems that are lingering on my system?
- Next by Date: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Previous by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Next by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|