Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:17:12 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 17:13, Mike McCarty wrote:
Its a 2.4gHz Athlon box.
Something wrong with your 58 second machine there Mike :-(
----
take his commentary with a grain of salt and recognize that he is using
FC-2 which I am sure few will argue was better abandoned for FC-3
Are you suggesting that FC4 would load it any faster?
Probably but I think you have a specific problem on that machine.
I suspect the specific problem I have is lack of RAM.
I've got a dual pII-450 running FC1 that starts OO in about 10
seconds. The first instance of Firefox with google as the home
page takes about 5 seconds, another window about 2. Does
hdparm -T -t show somewhere near 30MB/sec for buffered reads?
# hdparm -T -t /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 1096 MB in 2.00 seconds = 547.54 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.02 seconds = 21.86 MB/sec
Is that close enough to 30MB/s?
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- References:
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Tony Dietrich
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Craig White
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Prev by Date: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption (warning: long rant follows)
- Next by Date: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Previous by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Next by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|