Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:55:03 -0600
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 22:17, Mike McCarty wrote:
Its a 2.4gHz Athlon box.
Something wrong with your 58 second machine there Mike :-(
----
take his commentary with a grain of salt and recognize that he is using
FC-2 which I am sure few will argue was better abandoned for FC-3
Are you suggesting that FC4 would load it any faster?
Probably but I think you have a specific problem on that machine.
I suspect the specific problem I have is lack of RAM.
Or too many programs loaded. Adding RAM is easier than sorting
out what you don't really need to run, though.
I've got a dual pII-450 running FC1 that starts OO in about 10
seconds. The first instance of Firefox with google as the home
page takes about 5 seconds, another window about 2. Does
hdparm -T -t show somewhere near 30MB/sec for buffered reads?
# hdparm -T -t /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 1096 MB in 2.00 seconds = 547.54 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.02 seconds = 21.86 MB/sec
Is that close enough to 30MB/s?
It's less than my ancient PII-450 gets with an almost-as-old
66 mHZ IDE card. A 2.4 gHZ P4 that should be closer to your
specs gets 60MB/s. Do you see something like:
hda: 234441648 sectors (120034 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63,
UDMA(100)
if you look at 'dmesg | less'? (The UDMA and speed being
the relevant part).
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- References:
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Tony Dietrich
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Craig White
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Prev by Date: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption (warning: long rant follows)
- Next by Date: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Previous by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Next by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|