Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty <mike.mccarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:10:13 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 22:17, Mike McCarty wrote:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 1096 MB in 2.00 seconds = 547.54 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 66 MB in 3.02 seconds = 21.86 MB/sec
Is that close enough to 30MB/s?
It's less than my ancient PII-450 gets with an almost-as-old
66 mHZ IDE card. A 2.4 gHZ P4 that should be closer to your
specs gets 60MB/s. Do you see something like:
hda: 234441648 sectors (120034 MB) w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63,
UDMA(100)
if you look at 'dmesg | less'? (The UDMA and speed being
the relevant part).
# dmesg | grep UDMA
hda: 78165360 sectors (40020 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63, UDMA(100)
hdc: ATAPI 48X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive, 2048kB Cache, UDMA(33)
Looks more or less equivalent to what you have.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- References:
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Tony Dietrich
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Craig White
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Mike McCarty
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- From: Les Mikesell
- Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Prev by Date: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Previous by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Next by thread: Re: Two ways Microsoft sabotages Linux desktop adoption
- Index(es):