Re: Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:48:57 +0000
On Wednesday 08 March 2006 09:49, Paul Howarth wrote:
Done that, and tail shows it being allocated IRQ 10. It's correctly named, soSee if it detected your hardware first. Look in /var/log/messages for
the time that you inserted the module and see if anything relevant
appears.
There is absolutely nothing there for that time.
Not a good sign. You could try "rmmod tmscsim" and then do the modprobe
again just to check.
I believe that it is the correct driver.
Again, all documentation I can find refers to tmscsim as the correct driver.You might also try "cat /proc/scsi/scsi" and see what appears.
No attached devices.
Again, not a good sign,
Uf it was the right SCSI driver (I'm not convinced about that), you
*might* need to also load the "sg" (SCSI Generic) module before the
Hardware Browser could see an attached scanner. You'd certainly need the
sg module to use the scanner with SANE. However, the empty
/proc/scsi/scsi suggests to me that the tmscsim module is not the one
you need for your card.
sg and scsi_mod are now both loaded (no entries into messages when I
modprobed, so perhaps it already was loaded). scsi_mod is listed as being
used by sg, tmscsim and sd_mod
Three years ago you might have been using a different driver.I believe that is true - I didn't recognise the name of this driver. However,
this driver was written by a Tekram engineer, so it would seem reasonable
that it replaced an older one.
There are some scanner-related hints atYes and no. It sounds as though it should help, but I feel to be up against a
http://www.garloff.de/kurt/linux/dc390/problems.html which might be
appropriate for you.
blank wall. The first recommendation for tracing missing devices is to type
'cat /proc/scsi/scsi', which returns no devices. Next, they suggest
'cat /proc/scsi/tmscsim/H' where H represents the adapter device numer,
usually 0. There is no /proc/scsi/tmscsim.
Reading http://www.garloff.de/kurt/linux/dc390/README.tmscsim made me aware
that there is more than one version of DC390, but I checked the card's bios
configuration utility, which tells me that it is the basic DC390, using the
SCSI chip AM53C974A, which ties in with the info I got from tailing messages.
Next I tried 'echo "scsi add-single-device 0 0 3 0"' which gave me 'No such
file or directory' - the file exists, but is 0B long. I gave the parameters
from my dim memory, so I could be wrong about them. The SCSI card BIOS
reports Bus~ 00h, Device# 00h, Function# 00h, IO Address EC00h. Most of the
settings in there appear to be for SCSI drives. ISTC that nothing in there
had to be changed for using it with the scanner.
I am still worried that all the drivers I can find date back to 2000 at theIs there any relevance at all in the fact that all my FC4 boxes show
messages entries about automount being unable to find .directory?
Dunno.
latest. Maybe they are too old, but then I think this driver was included in
the distro. I'll keep reading, but I'm very confused.
Anne
Attachment:
pgp484of0TqIQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- References:
- Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- From: Anne Wilson
- Re: Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- From: Paul Howarth
- Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- Prev by Date: Re: Max Apache 2.0 (FC4) log file size on 32-bit systems?
- Next by Date: Re: Drivers?
- Previous by thread: Re: Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- Next by thread: Re: Addressing a SCSI film-scanner - long, sorry.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|